Mr. Speaker, I thank Congressman Conaway for organizing this hour and giving us an opportunity to present what we will call ``correct the record.'' How does that sound? I served, as you know and others, four terms in the State Senate in…
Mr. Speaker, I thank Congressman Conaway for organizing this hour and giving us an opportunity to present what we will call ``correct the record.'' How does that sound? I served, as you know and others, four terms in the State Senate in Georgia, and in three of those terms I was in the minority. At that time, we used to kind of call the majority party on the carpet and we would make certain that people knew exactly what they were doing. We got to where we were giving away what we were calling a stuck pig award. And we called it a stuck pig award because when you put the truth out on the table, some folks sometimes squeal.
That is kind of what I heard tonight from the Blue Dogs. They were very eloquent in their presentation, but what I heard was squealing. That is what I heard. I heard squealing.
They talked about the Deficit Reduction Act and why they thought it was done and why they felt it was to cover tax cuts. And we are going to talk about that a little tonight, and I appreciate the gentleman's bringing that up and putting that on the table. But I think it is important for people to appreciate and understand that across the Nation the reason that we took that step 2 weeks ago with the Deficit Reduction Act was not to cover for tax cuts, which, as I said, we will mention and talk about very specifically, because we are very proud of the tax decrease package we have that we will be putting on the table, but the reason we did the Deficit Reduction Act was to decrease the size of government. It was to cut waste and fraud and abuse and it was to fulfill the promise that we make, and I know some folks on the other side of the aisle make to their constituents, and that is that it is a principled position of decreasing the size of government, making the government smaller and spending less money.
That is why we passed that bill. That is why we put it on the table. We would love to have had some support from the other side of the aisle from some folks who say so often that they do believe that the government spends too much. We gave them a chance to put that vote up, and you heard them tonight themselves say, and they said so proudly, listen to this, not one Democrat voted for that. Well, now, that is real leadership. You put a spending cut, a savings bill on the table and not a single Democrat supports it.
Now, Congressman Conaway mentioned the increased tax revenue, and I think it is important to say that when you decrease taxes, what happens. What happens when you decrease taxes? The other side would have you believe that revenue plummets, that revenue to the Federal Government plummets. Well, if you look at the facts, the facts are that when you decrease taxes, what happens is that you increase revenue, as the gentleman said.
This chart is from the CBO and it shows clearly, as my colleague mentioned, in 2003, tax revenue to the Federal Government, $1.78 trillion. That is when the most recent tax decreases, tax cuts, took effect at that point. In 2004, $1.88 trillion. In 2005, $2.14 trillion.
I appreciate that so much, because that is exactly right. Anybody that is opposed to extending these tax decreases is in favor of, in fact, a tax increase.
And what could we expect from continuing the tax decrease? Well, I would expect, just as I know my colleague would, that the revenues to the Federal Government will increase, more than enough, I am certain, to continue the appropriate programs that we should at the Federal level, and, in fact, what we ought to be able to anticipate is the opportunity to further continue those tax decreases.
Now, I have some other examples of what happens when you decrease taxes that I would like to share with my colleagues. Remember, 2003 is when the tax decrease went into effect, and this chart here shows the amount of growth by each quarter, the amount of growth by each quarter before the tax cuts took effect and after tax cuts took effect.
What you will see very clearly, this is as vivid as it gets, before the tax cuts took effect, you had kind of variable growth. We had the difficulty, as the gentleman mentioned, of the challenge of 9/11, the extreme hardship that we faced at that point and the difficulty of recovering from that. The tax cuts were put in place and they took effect at the beginning of 2003, and since then, since then we have had 10 straight quarters of plus 3 percent or more growth in GDP. In fact, every one of those quarters is greater than every one of the quarters before when the tax cuts were not in place.
That is the kind of remarkable growth that occurs when you put more money in people's pockets. It increases the amount of economic activity throughout our country.
This is the remarkable chart that demonstrates again what happens with tax cuts, with tax decreases. This chart demonstrates the change in employment. These are the jobs across our Nation. Again, this line in the middle is when the tax cuts took effect. Before that you see from January 2001 through the beginning quarter of 2003, before the tax relief occurred, you see decreased job growth.
Again, 9/11 took an incredible toll, but decreased job growth. What happens when the tax cuts takes effect? You have increased job growth, with 4.4 million jobs created since the tax cuts took effect. Every single quarter you have job growth. Sometimes less, oftentimes a lot more. This past month, we had 215,000 new jobs created across our Nation.
So what happens when you cut taxes? You increase revenue to the government, you increase the economic productivity and growth in this Nation, and you increase jobs. That is what happens when you cut taxes.
Would my colleague agree with that?
Let me just share a few more charts with my colleagues, because I think these charts just speak loudly. They say a picture is worth a thousand words, and these charts can say it so much better than I can.
This shows again the jobs as it relates to the unemployment rate since the tax cuts took effect. So again, we have jobs that we see in this line down below here, the green line as it heads up; unemployment rate in the red line, and time across the bottom. So the tax cuts take effect right here. Job growth is relatively low. Continued upward increase in the amount of jobs. And in terms of the rate of unemployment, topped off in early 2003, and since then, has been steadily declining.
In fact, we are now at an unemployment rate in this Nation of 5 percent, which many economists will tell you is full employment; that people are changing jobs or moving or from between one position or another, that 5 percent unemployment is virtually full employment.
The unemployment rate right now is less than, less than the average unemployment rate for the 1970s, for the 1980s, and everybody remembers the boom time in the 1990s, for the entire decade of the 1990s. Less than the average rate right now for those decades. So I think that demonstrates clearly exactly what happens when you decrease taxes.
And the wonder and the beauty of our economy is that it responds so consistently and so clearly and really so quickly.
Let me share one more chart, because I think that oftentimes, we have the other side talking about the spiraling deficit and how the tax decreases add to that deficit. Well, in fact, what has happened over the past number of months and years is that the deficit in fact has decreased. With a decrease in taxes, the deficit has decreased. And over the past 18 months, what we have seen is a 30 percent decrease in the deficit. In fact, this year, a $138 billion decrease in the deficit.
So I want to thank my colleague once again for providing this time, but I think it is important that the American people appreciate that the responsibility that we believe we have in Congress is to make certain that individuals have more money in their pocket, are able to determine greater their destiny, to decrease the size of government, and that all of those things play into increasing the ability of the market to increase jobs and increase the productivity of our private sector and economic development.