Madam Speaker, on January 31, 2007, my good friend and colleague, Mr. Honda, introduced H. Res. 121 on Comfort Women, of which I am a proud co-sponsor. Given recent events, the necessity and imperative to pass H. Res. 121 by the full House…
Madam Speaker, on January 31, 2007, my good friend and colleague, Mr. Honda, introduced H. Res. 121 on Comfort Women, of which I am a proud co-sponsor. Given recent events, the necessity and imperative to pass H. Res. 121 by the full House of Representatives is now more important than ever. It is my hope that this non-binding resolution will signal to our friend and ally, the Government of Japan, that working to
officially resolve its longstanding historical issues will not only restore honor and dignity to the Comfort Women survivors, but bring out greater trust and cooperation among our other friends and allies in the region.
A formal apology by the Japanese government would help bring a sense of peace and healing to the women who were abused as well as to their families. Many of these innocent women were taken at a young age and suffered unspeakable and disgusting crimes that destroyed their lives. An apology cannot undo this damage, but it is important for the victims to know that the Japanese government has accepted responsibility in a clear an unequivocal manner. I believe an official apology would help strengthen and improve relations between our friends and allies in the Northeast Asian region.
Without objection, I wish to insert into the Congressional Record an editorial on this issue that appeared in the New York Times on Tuesday, March 6, appropriately entitled: ``No Comfort.''
[From The New York Times, March 6, 2007]
No Comfort
What part of ``Japanese Army sex slaves'' does Japan's
prime minister, Shinzo Abe, have so much trouble
understanding and apologizing for?
The underlying facts have long been beyond serious dispute.
During World War II, Japan's Army set up sites where women
rounded up from Japanese colonies like Korea were expected to
deliver sexual services to Japan's soldiers.
These were not commercial brothels. Force, explicit and
implicit, was used in recruiting these women. What went on in
them was serial rape, not prostitution. The Japanese Army's
involvement is documented in the government's own defense
files. A senior Tokyo official more or less apologized for
this horrific crime in 1993. The unofficial fund set up to
compensate victims is set to close down this month.
And Mr. Abe wants the issue to end there. Last week, he
claimed that there was no evidence that the victims had been
coerced. Yesterday, he grudgingly acknowledged the 1993 quasi
apology, but only as part of a pre-emptive declaration that
his government would reject the call, now pending in the
United States Congress, for an official apology. America
isn't the only country interested in seeing Japan belatedly
accept full responsibility. Korea and China are also
infuriated by years of Japanese equivocations over the issue.
Mr. Abe seems less concerned with repairing Japan's sullied
international reputation than with appealing to a large
right-wing faction within his Liberal Democratic Party that
insists that the whole shameful episode was a case of healthy
private enterprise. One ruling party lawmaker, in his
misplaced zeal to exculpate the Army, even suggested the
offensive analogy of a college that outsourced its cafeteria
to a private firm.
Japan is only dishonored by such efforts to contort the
truth.
The 1993 statement needs to be expanded upon, not whittled
down. Parliament should issue a frank apology and provide
generous official compensation to the surviving victims. It
is time for Japan's politicians--starting with Mr. Abe--to
recognize that the first step toward overcoming a shameful
past is acknowledging it.