To direct the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to conduct a review of all third party intentional human dosing studies to identify or quantify toxic effects.
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Senate amendment submitted
June 29, 2005
View full timeline
Senate amendment submitted
June 29, 2005
Senate amendment agreed to: Amendment SA 1068 agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay. 57 - 40. Record Vote Number: 161.
June 29, 2005
Roll call votes on amendments in Senate: Amendment SA 1068 agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay. 57 - 40. Record Vote Number: 161.
June 29, 2005
Senate amendment proposed (on the floor): Amendment SA 1068 proposed by Senator Burns.
June 29, 2005
Amendment SA 1068 proposed by Senator Burns. (consideration: CR S7552-7560; text: CR S7552) To direct the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to conduct a review of all third party intentional human dosing studies to identify or quantify toxic effects.
June 29, 2005
Amendment SA 1068 agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay. 57 - 40. Record Vote Number: 161.
June 29, 2005
Votes
1 roll call on this amendment
Text
Submitted
SA 1068. Mr. BURNS (for himself, Mr. Chambliss, Mr. Inhofe, and Mr. Brownback) proposed an amendment to the bill H.R. 2361, making appropriations for the Department of the Interior, environment, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2006, and for other purposes; as follows: On page 200, after line 2, add the following: Sec. . (a) The Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency shall conduct a thorough review of all third-party intentional human dosing studies to identify or quantify toxic effects currently submitted to the Agency under FIFRA to ensure that they: (1) address a clearly defined regulatory objective; (2) address a critical regulatory endpoint by enhancing the Agency's scientific data bases; (3) were designed and being conducted in a manner that ensured the study was adequate scientifically to answer the question and ensured the safety of volunteers; (4) was designed to produce societal benefits that outweigh any anticipated risks to participants; (5) adhered to all recognized ethical standards and procedures in place at the time the study was conducted; and (6) are consistent with section 12(a)(2)(P) of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act and all other applicable laws. (b) The Administrator shall, within 60 days of the enactment of this Act, report to the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations; the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry; and the House Committee on Agriculture on the results of the review required under subsection (a) and any actions taken pursuant to the review. (c) Within 180 days of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall issue a final rule that addresses applying ethical standards to third party studies involving intentional human dosing to identify or quantify toxic effects. ______