H.Res. 769House108th Congress (2003-2005)In Committee

Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 2038) to reauthorize the assault weapons ban, and for other purposes.

Introduced September 13, 2004

Legislative Activity

Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action

2 earlier actions
HouseDischarge Latest Action

Motion to Discharge Committee filed by Mr. Meehan. Petition No: 108-12. (Discharge petition text with signatures.)

September 28, 2004

View full timeline
HouseIntro Referral

Introduced in House

September 13, 2004

HouseIntro Referral

Referred to the House Committee on Rules.

September 13, 2004

HouseDischarge

Motion to Discharge Committee filed by Mr. Meehan. Petition No: 108-12. (Discharge petition text with signatures.)

September 28, 2004

Floor Debate

24 members

What members said about H.Res. 769 on the floor

7 Republicans17 Democrats
Mark E. Souder
Rep. Mark E. SouderR-IN-3 · Sep 29, 2004

Mr. Speaker, pursuant to House Resolution 803, I call up the bill (H.R. 3193) to restore second amendment rights in the District of Columbia, and ask for its immediate consideration. Mr. Speaker, I…

Eleanor Holmes Norton
Rep. Eleanor Holmes NortonD-DC · Sep 29, 2004

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, I am compelled to begin by noting the ludicrous logic on which this debate has already begun. The gentleman from Indiana (Mr.…

Louise McIntosh Slaughter
Rep. Louise McIntosh SlaughterD-NY-28 · Sep 29, 2004

Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to this rule and this bill. The rule before us is a closed rule allowing only 60 minutes of debate and prohibits consideration of all the Democratic amendments…

Chris Van Hollen
Rep. Chris Van HollenD-MD-8 · Sep 29, 2004

Mr. Speaker, I am proud to join today with my colleague, the gentlewoman from the neighboring congressional district, the District of Columbia (Ms. Norton), in opposing this bill. The District of…

Mike Ross
Rep. Mike RossD-AR-4 · Sep 29, 2004

I yield to the gentleman from Oklahoma. (Mr. CARSON of Oklahoma asked and was given permission to revise and extend his remarks.) Mr. Speaker, reclaiming my time, I rise today and join 43 of my…

Show 8 more
Elijah E. Cummings
Rep. Elijah E. CummingsD-MD-7 · Sep 29, 2004

Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to the District of Columbia Personal Protection Act, H.R. 3193, an outrageous effort spearheaded by my friend Representative Souder of Indiana, to repeal the ban on…

Ron Paul
Rep. Ron PaulR-TX-14 · Sep 29, 2004

Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of House Resolution 3193, the District of Columbia Personal Protection Act. I am a cosponsor of this legislation that ensures greater respect for the right to bear arms…

Rush Holt
Rep. Rush HoltD-NJ-12 · Sep 29, 2004

Mr. Speaker, I rise today to express my strong opposition to H.R. 3193, the so-called District of Columbia Personal Protection Act. I do not agree with the premise that more hand guns and assault…

Jesse L. Jackson, Jr.
Rep. Jesse L. Jackson, Jr.D-IL-2 · Sep 29, 2004

Mr. Speaker, first. In addition to violating the Republicans' ``sacred oath'' to support ``states' rights;'' this body is violating the citizens of the District of Columbia's right to…

Mark Udall
Rep. Mark UdallD-CO-2 · Sep 29, 2004

Mr. Speaker, I cannot support this bill, which would repeal a number of local laws adopted by the District of Columbia City Council and would prohibit the passage of similar local laws in the future.…

Fortney Pete Stark
Rep. Fortney Pete StarkD-CA-13 · Sep 29, 2004

Mr. Speaker, I rise in outraged opposition to H.R. 3193, the so-called District of Columbia Personal Protection Act. This bill strips away gun safety laws passed by the City Council here in our…

Sam Graves
Rep. Sam GravesR-MO-6 · Sep 29, 2004

Mr. Speaker, while we ultimately are debating two different gun control bans in the District of Columbia, I am going to confine my comments to the District's ban on the acquisition or possession of a…

Henry A. Waxman
Rep. Henry A. WaxmanD-CA-30 · Sep 29, 2004

Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to this bill. The other side would have you believe that they want to repeal legislation in the District of Columbia to stop handguns. But that is not what this bill…

Show 11 more
Tom Davis
Rep. Tom DavisR-VA-11 · Sep 29, 2004

Mr. Speaker, I rise today in opposition to H.R. 3193, and I respect the gentleman from Indiana's perspective on this issue. I think there is room in the House for disagreement. But my opposition is…

Lincoln Davis
Rep. Lincoln DavisD-TN-4 · Sep 29, 2004

Mr. Speaker, without a doubt, the provisions of the District of Columbia's gun laws that have the most adverse effect upon the largest number of law-abiding District residents, are the ban on using…

James P. Moran
Rep. James P. MoranD-VA-8 · Sep 29, 2004

Mr. Speaker, I rise today in opposition to legislation that has been introduced to usurp the District of Columbia's home rule and greatly exacerbate an already very serious gun violence problem here…

John N. Hostettler
Rep. John N. HostettlerR-IN-8 · Sep 29, 2004

I thank the gentleman for yielding me this time and commend him on his legislation that I am speaking in support of. Mr. Speaker, those of us who have the honor of serving in Congress are in good…

C. L. (Butch) Otter
Rep. C. L. (Butch) OtterR-ID-1 · Sep 29, 2004

Mr. Speaker, I always try to apply a personal ``Three C'' test to questions of public policy. First I ask myself whether it's constitutional. Then I consider whether it's something my constituents…

Julia Carson
Rep. Julia CarsonD-IN-7 · Sep 29, 2004

Mr. Speaker, let me say how much I appreciate the Delegate from the District of Columbia for carrying on the good fight. It is ironic that this bill proposes to implement constitutional rights to the…

Sanford D. Bishop, Jr.
Rep. Sanford D. Bishop, Jr.D-GA-2 · Sep 29, 2004

Mr. Speaker, all Americans know that gun control continues to be a serious subject of debate, right here in the District of Columbia, in the State of Georgia, which I represent, and across this…

Donna M. Christensen
Rep. Donna M. ChristensenD-VI · Sep 29, 2004

Mr. Speaker, two weeks ago this House blocked consideration of legislation sponsored by my colleague from New York, Mrs. McCarthy, to extend the ban on the manufacture, transfer, or possession of…

James R. Langevin
Rep. James R. LangevinD-RI-2 · Sep 29, 2004

Mr. Speaker, today I rise in strong opposition to H.R. 3193, legislation that would repeal Washington, DC's, self-enacted gun ban. For nearly 30 years, this ban has protected the citizens of…

Zach Wamp
Rep. Zach WampR-TN-3 · Sep 29, 2004

Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman for yielding me this time. This is an emotionally charged issue and I can understand why. I think it is important, though, that we adhere to the facts. The…

Lois Capps
Rep. Lois CappsD-CA-23 · Sep 29, 2004

I thank my colleague from the District of Columbia for yielding me this time. Mr. Speaker, I rise in strong opposition to this bill. Our troops are struggling in Iraq. The budget deficit is at an…

Bill Text

Latest available legislative text

Reading Mode
Latest
Introduced in HouseIssued September 13, 2004

IV

108th CONGRESS

2d Session

H. RES. 769

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

September 13, 2004

Mr. Meehan submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 2038) to reauthorize the assault weapons ban, and for other purposes.

That, immediately upon the adoption of this resolution, the House shall without intervention of any point of order consider in the House the bill (H.R. 2038) to reauthorize the assault weapons ban, and for other purposes. The bill shall be considered as read for amendment. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and on any amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate on the bill equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Judiciary; (2) an amendment, if offered by Rep. McCarthy of New York or her designee, which shall be in order without intervention of any point of order (except those arising under clause 7 of rule XVI), shall be considered as read, and shall be separately debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with or without instructions.