Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of this legislation. This legislation would extend permanent normal trade relations to Vietnam. That is…
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of this legislation. This legislation would extend permanent normal trade relations to Vietnam. That is necessary for the United States to be able to benefit from Vietnam's entering the World Trade Organization, and Vietnam is entering the World Trade Organization. It will give U.S. manufacturers and producers more access to the market in Vietnam, which is the fastest growing economy in Southeast Asia. It also provides stronger protection for American companies in regards to intellectual property rights.
But I want to make it clear no one should interpret the passage of Permanent Normal Trade Relations for Vietnam as a clean bill of health on their human rights. Vietnam has a long way to go in dealing with human rights issues. Yes, we are pleased that the State Department has removed them from a country of particular concern as it relates to religious freedom. That is an important step forward. But when you look at the list of issues that still remain in Vietnam on human rights, it is a matter of concern for our country.
Vietnam fails to provide its citizens with any meaningful vote, and the government censors domestic media sources, blocks foreign radio broadcasts and Web sites, and denies its people the right to form independent organizations, including independent unions representing working people. The government also routinely cracks down harshly on antigovernment protesters.
We cannot let these shortcomings go unchallenged. PNTR should not be stopped. That is not the right tool for us to deal with those issues. Vietnam is entering the World Trade Organization. We need to be part of that. We need to engage Vietnam. We need to look for new ways in which we can have Vietnam deal with these human rights issues. It is a good step that Vietnam is entering the World Trade Organization. That is going to be helpful for us in dealing with the human rights issues.
I think we need to take note that Vietnam has taken some important steps in the right direction and that we need to make sure that they continue with their entry into the WTO, that more is expected, and that they will adhere to the rule of law. And countries with open economies are more likely to have more open societies.
I also support the provisions in this bill that deal with trade preferences for Haiti and Africa. Haiti is the poorest country in our hemisphere. We have a moral obligation to do all that we can to raise the standard of living of its
people, our neighbors in the Caribbean, and to support the fragile democracy. The administration of Haiti offers a hope of an improved standard of living for the Haitian people, but only if the United States is prepared to engage with trade and investment and support Haiti with assistance. We have a chance with this legislation to do exactly that.
The countries of Sub-Saharan Africa also merit and need stronger trade and investment relationship and our support. The AGOA program has had wide support in this Congress and has been highly successful since its inception more than 6 years ago. Since its passage in the spring of 2000, U.S. imports from eligible African countries have increased by more than 300 percent, AGOA has attracted over $340 million in new investment, and it has helped to create thousands of new jobs in Africa. Thirty-seven African countries now participate in AGOA. I hope that others, including Liberia, will soon be eligible. African exports to the United States under AGOA totaled $38 billion in 2005, an increase of more than 300 percent since 2002. The list goes on and on and on where we have been able to see economic progress through AGOA.
The problem is that we can do more and should do more. This bill includes a 6-year extension of the third-country fabric provision, the longest extension for this provision in the history of the AGOA program. It also extends other benefits in the textile and apparel sector from 2008 to 2015, a major improvement.
Mr. Speaker, these provisions will help the African workers and businesses compete against China and other competitors, including competitors who suppress their workers' rights and provide subsidies to their industries. That is in the interest of the United States and our manufacturers and producers to have that type of competition from Sub- Saharan Africa.
It is for all these reasons that this is a well-balanced bill that will advance U.S. interests, and I urge my colleagues to support the legislation.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to yield 7 minutes to the gentleman from Michigan (Mr. Levin), one of the senior members of the Ways and Means Committee and one of the most active on trade issues.
(Mr. LEVIN asked and was given permission to revise and extend his remarks.)
Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to yield 2 minutes to the gentlewoman from California, Maxine Waters.
Mr. Speaker, I will be glad to give my friend the 20 seconds he wanted.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, if I might first start by saying, the past 2 years I have had the honor of being the ranking Democrat on the Trade Subcommittee of the Ways and Means Committee. I want to thank Mr. Shaw for his help and cooperation during these past 2 years. I think that we have acted responsibly on many initiatives, but, more importantly, we have had an opportunity to talk directly with trade representatives from many other countries in an effort to move forward trade with the United States.
I want to thank Tim Reif, the staff director on the Democratic side, for his help during all this period of time. It was a new subcommittee for me, and I can tell you I could not have done it without the help of our staff, Mr. Reif and the others.
On a personal note, this will be my last opportunity to speak on the floor of this body, and I want to thank my constituents in the Third Congressional District of Maryland for giving me the opportunity to serve in this body during the past 20 years; 18 of those years I have served on the Ways and Means Committee. The voters of Maryland have now given me the opportunity to move to the other body.
I want to thank all of the Members that I have served with over these past 20 years. This is an incredible body of the people's House in which the Members truly are concerned about the traditions of this body and the work that we do.
I have had a chance to serve with many Members on the Ways and Means Committee, and we don't always agree on issues. I know that Bill Thomas will be leaving and Clay Shaw will be leaving this body also. Both carried the tradition of the Ways and Means Committee in this body of doing what they thought was right, not only to advance a policy for this Nation, but to make sure that anything that came out of our committee lived up to the highest standards of the Ways and Means Committee and was drafted properly, and there was no misunderstanding of the intentions of what we were trying to do.
Many times that was difficult to be done, and I just want to congratulate Mr. Thomas for carrying out that awesome responsibility as Chair of the Ways and Means Committee. I can tell you that I have enjoyed every moment in this body, even those difficult evenings. This is truly a unique opportunity, to be given the opportunity to serve in this great body.
Once again, I want to thank the courtesies that I have received from each of the Members, and, again, thank the people from Maryland for giving me this opportunity.
Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.