I thank the gentleman for yielding. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to let Florida's seniors and all of America's seniors know the scary truth about H.R. 4, the legislation to, quote, negotiate prescription drug prices in Medicare. While the…
I thank the gentleman for yielding.
Mr. Speaker, I rise today to let Florida's seniors and all of America's seniors know the scary truth about H.R. 4, the legislation to, quote, negotiate prescription drug prices in Medicare. While the rhetoric would lead you to believe that H.R. 4 is the same legislation from the past that I actually supported, kind of like GM said, it is not your father's Oldsmobile. This is not the same bill as last year.
Last year's legislation, I believe, was based on sound policy. Unfortunately, the bill before us today was crafted kind of like in the middle of the night, with no real input from the other side, and it could be described as a bait-and-switch game foisted on America's seniors.
As I said at the outset, I believe that this bill will actually harm America's seniors. Supporters of the bill talk about negotiation. The government doesn't really negotiate.
Let me give you an example. Here is the example of the Medicare part D, actually, the AARP plan, where over 100 great drugs are covered.
However, if you look at when government does negotiate, it excludes some very important drugs to seniors, such as Crestor, Detrol, Evista, Flomax, Lipitor, Prevacid and Vytorin. How many seniors are on medicines such as Lipitor? A large number. It is absolutely necessary for lowering cholesterol. But when you start to negotiate, that array of drugs that are available is suddenly shrunk.
Prescription drug access is not a partisan issue. My constituents know that I am not afraid to cross party lines to get things done. Throughout this entire 2-week period, I voted for legislation, but I don't support this bill because it is a bait-and-switch.
I do not stand alone in this belief. Veterans' organizations, mental health organizations and even CBO say it is a bad bill.
Mr. Speaker, I rise today to let Florida's seniors know the scary truth about H.R. 4, legislation to negotiate prescription drug prices in Medicare.
While the rhetoric from the other side would lead you to believe that H.R. 4 is the same legislation debated in the past, I rise to tell you that H.R. 4 is not your father's Oldsmobile.
In the I09th Congress, I supported bipartisan legislation introduced by Representative Jo Ann Emerson that would have allowed HHS to negotiate prescription drug prices for Medicare.
Mrs. Emerson's legislation was based on sound policy, and would have been open to amendment on the House floor.
Unfortunately, the bill before the House today was crafted by Democrats in the middle of the night, and with no Republican input. It is nothing but a dangerous bait and switch game foisted on American seniors.
Even more damning to the Democrat's commitment to open government, this bill is being debated under a martial law rule, with no possibility to offer amendments or make improvements.
As I said at the outset, this bill will harm American seniors.
Supporters of H.R. 4 hold up the Department of Veterans Affairs as a resounding prescription drug success. And I agree this is a great program.
However, these misinformed Members are comparing apples to oranges.
The VA does not haggle over prices with pharmaceutical companies; rather, it follows certain formulas set in federal law.
Medicare has 4,300+ drugs approved; the VA only has 1,300 drugs approved.
Medicare supports the newest and most widely used drugs; the VA relies on older and less effective drugs. Lipitor, for example, which helps lower cholesterol and prevents heart attacks, could be eliminated. The VA does not offer it!
These three examples make it clear that if the Democrats follow the VA model, seniors will have fewer choices and older, out-of-date drugs.
In fact, groups like the Military Order of the Purple Heart and the American Legion believe that Medicare drug negotiation will actually increase drug prices and cost American veterans even more each month!
You know, all of us fill our shopping cart at the grocery store each week. The consequence of H.R. 4 will be to force your grocery store to offer fewer items and limit your shopping choices. Here's just one example.
Eighteen months ago, I met a World War II veteran who told me that he and his wife were paying $2,000 a month out of pocket for a breakthrough medication that her doctor prescribed (Glevac).
This was a severe financial burden, just to purchase the medicine to keep her alive.
Today, with the Medicare Prescription Drug plan, this couple not only gets Glevac medication, but has had their costs cut to almost nothing.
If H.R. 4 were to become law, it is likely that anti-cancer drugs like this one would be taken off the Medicare list and replaced with older and less effective ones.
Let me be clear to everyone watching on C-SPAN.
Prescription drug access is not a partisan issue.
My constituents know that I am not afraid to cross party lines to get things done.
Just yesterday I voted to support stem cell research. The day before that I voted to raise the minimum wage.
And, I do support allowing HHS to negotiate prescription drug prices.
But this bill is a bait and switch tactic.
The Democrats have crafted a seriously flawed plan, one that I believe will cause irreparable harm to millions of seniors.
And I do not stand alone in this belief. Veteran's organizations, mental health organizations, and others all have come out in opposition to H.R. 4. The non-partisan CBO says it will not save money.
Listen up America--let's be cautious on this issue. The last thing Congress needs to do is to take steps that unwittingly hurt our seniors.
I urge my colleagues to oppose this bill.