Undocumented Alien Emergency Medical Assistance Amendments Of 2004
Mr. Speaker, I yield such time as he may consume to the gentleman from Arizona (Mr. Kolbe). Mr. Speaker, I yield myself 3\1/2\ minutes. Mr. Speaker, I rise in strong opposition to H.R. 3722. I think this is one of the most outrageous…
Mr. Speaker, I yield such time as he may consume to the gentleman from Arizona (Mr. Kolbe).
Mr. Speaker, I yield myself 3\1/2\ minutes.
Mr. Speaker, I rise in strong opposition to H.R. 3722. I think this is one of the most outrageous pieces of legislation I have seen this year, and unfortunately I believe it is a misguided bill. I believe that this bill does not stand for all of those that we represent in our districts.
I understand that through the census count we account for everyone in our districts, and that goes for the gentleman from Orange County, California (Mr. Rohrabacher), where I know he has an undisclosed number of people who may not be registered or accounted for; but he gets credit for that. Those numbers are put into place because we represent every single person, whether they are accounted for or not legally.
This bill goes in the wrong direction because it asks for our hospitals to become enforcers of immigration law. I cannot underscore how important it is to discuss this matter. Because as it is now, in California, we have already gone through the battle of 187 and trying to keep health care services and English educational services for children. The courts found that unconstitutional. Do we have to go to battle again?
Why does this bill have to direct our resources that right now are so, so important for every single person in our districts and be used to ask our hospital administrators, doctors, nurses, aides, to now require to have 5 years' worth of records that they must maintain giving some kind of evidence that they serve people who may be undocumented? That, in and of itself, I would say is a waste of time and money, money that should be afforded to sick people.
What happens in a classroom when you have a sick child who may, under no fault of their own, be there and not be a U.S. citizen? When they go to kindergarten, there is nothing that says that the child next to them will not be infected by maybe a contagious disease that they have. Hopefully, that never happens; but the fact that they would be prevented from health care services, and just knowing the fear that that family would have to go through to enter into the doors of a hospital knowing somehow they may not come back; that somehow Homeland Security is going to be there to pick them up and ship them back. And what about a woman going through active labor? She will be deported, because under the gentleman's bill that is what it says. The bill goes in the wrong direction.
I am standing with people in my district. And, in fact, there are several hospitals in the gentleman's own district who are against the bill. Some of the hospitals in Orange County: Garden Grove Hospital Medical Center, Loma Linda University, Queen of Angels Hollywood Presbyterian Hospital, Scripps Mercy Hospital, Suburban Medical Center, Sutter Medical Center in Santa Rosa, and Western Medical Center in Santa Ana.
Throughout the State of California we are finding many of our friends, both in public and private sector hospitals, are against this bill. So I do not think we are standing alone here. I think we are standing very united that we see a very misguided bill, unfortunately, that is being presented to us today.
The Federation of American Hospitals, the American Hospital Association, the Catholic Health Association of the United States, and the National Association of Children's Hospitals are all in agreement that this bill goes in the wrong direction.
I would ask for Members to consider the people who are joining us today that are saying this is the wrong message. We all have an obligation, I believe, to provide under our own laws service to people who come to our hospitals. That is a given. We do that. And maybe it is an unfunded mandate, but it is one we all abide by. I do not think we are in a position to turn people away.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 3 minutes and 20 seconds to the distinguished gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Menendez).
(Mr. MENENDEZ asked and was given permission to revise and extend his remarks.)
Mr. Speaker, I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to the gentleman from California (Mr. Waxman).
Mr. Speaker, I yield 20 seconds to the gentleman from California (Mr. Waxman).
Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from California (Mr. Dreier).
Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, I submit for the Record letters from various hospitals and organizations in opposition to this bill.
May 13, 2004.
RE: H.R. 3722 (Rohrabacher)--Oppose
Dear Congresswoman Solis: On behalf of Private Essential
Access Community Hospitals, Inc. (PEACH, Inc.), representing
37 private safety net hospitals across California, I am
writing to express our strong opposition to H.R. 3722
(Rohrabacher), which would require hospitals to document the
immigration status of those seeking emergency care. We ask
for your NO vote when this measure comes before the House
this month.
In California and throughout the nation, private safety net
hospitals are a vital segment of the safety net, providing
critical health care services to diverse populations within
their communities, including undocumented immigrants. PEACH
hospitals consider it part of their mission to provide
essential services to all who seek care regardless of any
barrier, including ability to pay or immigration status.
We have two primary concerns about H.R. 3722. First and
foremost, our hospitals are in the business, socially,
morally and economically, of saving lives and protecting the
health care of their communities. They are not in the
business of serving as immigration officers. This is neither
the role of hospitals nor an effective use of extremely
limited hospital funds and staff time--particularly in an
emergency department setting.
Second, we believe that H.R. 3722, rather than discouraging
the tide of illegal immigration, would instead have a
negative impact on public health care. Individuals who are in
need of emergency care, including those with contagious
conditions and/or who are seriously ill, would be forced to
avoid treatment in order to avoid the threat of deportation.
This would likely result in the spread of serious and
contagious conditions to the greater community creating a
health care epidemic as well as a secondary wave of patients
needing costly emergency care.
PEACH appreciates the desire to stem illegal immigration,
but H.R. 3722 sets a very dangerous precedent by using health
care providers as adjunct Border Patrol. We urge you to
defeat this ill-advised measure, and appreciate your
consideration of the views of those who are on the front
lines of health care every day.
Sincerely,
Catherine K. Douglas,
President and CEO, PEACH, Inc.
On behalf of:
California Hospital Medical Center, Central Valley
General Hospital, Citrus Valley Medical Center--Inter-
Community Campus, City of Hope National Medical Center,
College Hospital Cerritos, College Hospital Costa Mesa,
Community Hospital of San Bernardino, Community and
Mission Hospitals of Huntington Park, Daniel Freeman
Memorial Hospital, Fountain Valley Regional Hospital
and Medical Center.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 1\1/3\ minutes to the gentlewoman from Guam (Ms. Bordallo).
Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentlewoman from Illinois (Ms. Schakowsky).
Mr. Speaker, I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to the gentlewoman from California (Ms. Linda T. Sanchez).
Mr. Speaker, I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Hinojosa).
Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Doggett).
Mr. Speaker, I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to the gentleman from New York (Mr. Crowley).
Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentlewoman from California (Ms. Waters).
Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time.
In closing, I urge all my colleagues to join the hospitals, doctors, nurses, business owners, women's groups, children advocates, civil rights organizations, and, yes, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce to stand strongly against this bill. We cannot let this bill be the message to send to the American people about what the U.S. Congress thinks about the role of hospitals. We cannot let this bill be the message we send to the American people about what we think about immigrants, hardworking, tax-paying immigrants who come to this country for a better life, just as my parents did some 50 years ago. In fact, the average immigrant contributes about $1,800 more in taxes annually than he or she receives in any form of benefit, because they do not collect. We can do better than this bill. I urge my colleagues to vote against
Mr. Speaker, on that I demand the yeas and nays.