Mr. Speaker, I have an amendment at the desk. Mr. Speaker, I thank Chairwoman Foxx and the Committee on Education and the Workforce for their work on this important bill that will benefit small businesses and the families who work for…
Mr. Speaker, I have an amendment at the desk.
Mr. Speaker, I thank Chairwoman Foxx and the Committee on Education and the Workforce for their work on this important bill that will benefit small businesses and the families who work for them.
My amendment to the Small Business Health Fairness Act provides a straightforward clarification to ensure that existing association health plans can continue to operate and provide high-quality, affordable care to as many people as possible.
This amendment safeguards association health plans that have been successfully operating under State and Federal law--many of them for decades. We will be making certain that they would not inadvertently be disadvantaged by new Federal legislation or regulation or vulnerable to efforts to restrict access and limit choices.
Why do we need this amendment?
Because I fear what happened in my State will happen in others, where the insurance commissioner attempted to reject 42 out of about 60 association health plans. His office interpreted ObamaCare as giving him a mandate as justification for attempting to eliminate virtually all of these popular plans. By adopting my amendment, it will make crystal clear in the underlying bill that this won't be tolerated, and it will support both existing and future association health plans.
Talk to one of the nearly 400,000 individuals in my home State of Washington who get their care from an association plan, and you will find out why so many Washington businesses renew their plans every year.
Our State has been fortunate to have a robust AHP market that has become essential to providing cost-effective choices to small-business employers, thanks to bipartisan legislation enacted in the mid-1990s. In the case of one association plan operating in my State, roughly 40 percent of participating small-business employers did not previously offer health coverage.
My amendment is supported by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. In its letter to me, which I include in the Record, the U.S. Chamber indicated that it shares my interest in making sure that State-based association health plans that currently exist are able to continue operating in accordance with existing State and Federal law. My amendment is also supported by the Association of Washington Business.
Chamber of Commerce of the
United States of America,
Washington, DC, March 20, 2017.
Hon. Jaime Herrera Beutler,
House of Representatives,
Washington, DC.
Dear Congresswoman Herrera Beutler: Thank you for your
attention to the concerns raised by the Association of
Washington Businesses regarding H.R. 1101, the ``Small
Business Health Fairness Act.'' The U.S. Chamber of Commerce
has several state chambers of commerce members that provide
state-based quality health care coverage to their member
companies. The Chamber shares your interest in making sure
that the state-based Association Health Plans that currently
exist are able to continue to operate in accordance with
existing state and federal law without being disadvantaged by
this new federal legislation.
The Chamber appreciates your commitment to small businesses
and to ensuring that current affordable coverage options
continue to be available alongside new options in a
nondiscriminatory and fair environment. Thank you for your
dedication and efforts, and we look forward to continuing to
work with you to advance the priorities and interest of
business.
Sincerely,
Randel K. Johnson.
Mr. Speaker, I am confident that the underlying legislation before us today will improve the ability of small businesses to access affordable, high-quality health coverage in every State across the country. However, first, this body should, as clearly as possible, ensure that those States that already have successfully operating association health plans are not disrupted, which is what my amendment would do.
I urge my colleagues to support this amendment, and I thank the chairwoman for her work on this.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, how much time do I have remaining?
Mr. Speaker, I would just like to say that part of the reason this underlying bill is so critical is because we just don't believe one size fits all. When it comes to health coverage, we need to make sure that there are many different options for families, individuals, and businesses. We are clarifying basically a technical change here that allows continued existing plans to operate.
Who can be opposed to existing plans operating and offering more options and more plans?
This is exactly what Republicans are doing right now. We are fighting to make sure that the families and the people we represent have those options and their choices, that they can keep their doctor, that their health premiums will come down, that they can maybe get a plan through their work, or maybe they will be able to get into the individual market and self-insure--options--because one size does not fit all, which is why this bill is crucial and why my amendment to this bill makes it better. That is why we are going to move forward and make sure that more Americans have access to care--not just on paper--but care that gets them to in to the doctor, that gets them the care that they need, whether it is a specialist or a primary care doctor.
Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.