Water Resources Development Act Of 2005
Mr. Chairman, I thank the gentlewoman for yielding me this time. I would also like to thank the gentleman from Alaska (Mr. Young), chairman of the full committee; the gentleman from Minnesota (Mr. Oberstar); the gentleman from Tennessee…
Mr. Chairman, I thank the gentlewoman for yielding me this time.
I would also like to thank the gentleman from Alaska (Mr. Young), chairman of the full committee; the gentleman from Minnesota (Mr. Oberstar); the gentleman from Tennessee (Mr. Duncan), the chairman of the subcommittee, for all of his hard work; and of course the work of the gentlewoman from Texas (Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson), our ranking member on the subcommittee, for a job well done for bringing this legislation to the floor today. Without their strong leadership, dedication and persistence, we would not have a bill before us to consider.
H.R. 2864 authorizes projects for major flood control, navigation, environmental restoration, and other water resource projects, as well as it includes authorization of several important projects to restore and enhance the Nation's environmental infrastructure.
The United States transportation system is the envy of the world. We have an extensive system of highways, ports, locks and dams, and airports. Yet we have neglected to upgrade and modernize our infrastructure over the years. We should not build infrastructure in this country and then walk away from it without maintaining it and modernizing it as it becomes antiquated like we have done with the Upper Mississippi River and the Illinois Waterways lock and dam system.
This bill, after 15 years of talking and inaction, finally authorizes the modernization of the Upper Mississippi and Illinois Waterway system. The bill authorizes the replacement of 600-foot navigation locks with seven new 1,200-foot locks. In addition, the bill authorizes the largest environmental restoration program, next to the Florida Everglades, to ensure that the project goes forward respecting the environment and minimizing any adverse impact.
At a time when other countries are investing and improving their navigation systems, we are still operating a lock and dam system that is well over a half century old, built to handle 600-foot barges, not the 1,200-foot barges of today, and a system that exceeded its life expectancy over 20 years ago and is very expensive to maintain and repair. Our current system loses about 10 percent of its capacity every year due to system failures and breakdowns.
The gentleman from Oregon (Mr. Blumenauer) and the gentleman from Arizona (Mr. Flake), my friends, have offered an amendment that I urge all of my colleagues to oppose. In my opinion, if this amendment is adopted, it will further delay and most likely kill the modernization project. They raise questions about the need for the project and have concerns about the environment. They believe that, with the increased use of ethanol here in the United States, that traffic will decrease in the coming years on the Mississippi River and the Illinois waterways. On the question of the need to modernize for the future of the system, some studies have said that major increases in traffic will take place. Others have indicated that the demand
will decrease. It depends on which study we look at and read and which study we want to believe.
What we do know for certain is that other countries are investing in modernizing their navigation system and our system on the Upper Mississippi and the Illinois waterway system outlived its life expectancy over 20 years ago. The system cannot handle today's traffic in an efficient and cost-effective manner, and it is costing taxpayers tens of millions of dollars to patch it together, let alone the cost in time and money.
On the issue of ethanol, I agree with my friends that there will be an increase in the production of ethanol and more of a demand here at home.
Let me also say that increase in demand here at home will require that we transport both grain and DDGS both in the United States and abroad. Already, in the first quarter of this year, we have seen an 11 percent increase in DDGS shipped to other countries using ethanol through the New Orleans Port.
Lastly, the environment. I am as concerned about the environment as anyone. I would not support the modernization of the Upper Mississippi without the safeguards in this bill that respect the environment. This project will have the second largest environmental restoration program in the Nation.
Finally, we do not need another study. We do not need further delays. We need to move forward with the project to modernize the navigation system, while providing congressional oversight in making certain that the environmental restoration protections are implemented.
The gentleman from Tennessee (Chairman Duncan) has indicated that this bill probably has more support from the business community and labor unions than any bill that we will consider this year.
Mr. Chairman, I thank the gentleman from Tennessee for yielding me this time.
I said previously, and I will say again, that I am in opposition to this amendment. Almost 70 percent of U.S. ag exports travel the upper Mississippi River and the Illinois waterway system. The current locks are 50 to 70 years old. They were built to handle 600-foot barges, not the 1,200-foot barges today. We are spending millions of dollars in emergency repairs. I have four pages of a computer printout in small print where we have spent $65 million in repairs, emergency repairs, to the current locks. Taxpayers are spending millions of dollars to put a Band-Aid on a system that is antiquated. We must modernize these locks. We cannot waste time. We cannot delay the project.
There is not another bill that has come to this floor this session that I am aware of that has had the support of the business community and labor unions. The building trades as well as the American Chamber of Commerce and a number of other groups and organizations have come together in support of this bill. I ask that our colleagues reject this amendment and vote ``yes'' on final passage.