Madam Speaker, I would like to submit the following op-ed published in The Wall Street Journal on November 12, 2008, by Masoud Barzani, President of the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. It conveys the strong and important relationship between the…
Madam Speaker, I would like to submit the following op-ed published in The Wall Street Journal on November 12, 2008, by Masoud Barzani, President of the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. It conveys the strong and important relationship between the Iraqi Kurdish population and the United States as well as their efforts to help build a peaceful Iraq. I was fortunate this year to visit the Kurdistan Region, and I know firsthand of Kurdish appreciation of the American people.
[From the Wall Street Journal, November 12, 2008]
Kurdistan Is a Model for Iraq--Our Path to a Secular, Federal Democracy
is Inspired by the U.S.
(By Masoud Barzani)
Iraq's Kurds have consistently been America's closest
allies in Iraq. Our Peshmerga forces fought alongside the
U.S. military to liberate the country, suffering more
casualties than any other U.S. ally.
And while some Iraqi politicians have challenged the U.S.-
Iraq security agreement, Iraq's Kurdish leaders have endorsed
the pact as essential for U.S. combat troops to continue
fighting terrorists in Iraq.
The Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) is committed to a
federal, democratic Iraq that is at peace with its neighbors.
We have benefited enormously from the service and
sacrifices of America's armed forces and their families, and
we are deeply grateful. We are also proud to have shared in
such sacrifices; my brother was among those severely wounded
during the liberation of Iraq.
Last year, following a U.S. request, we deployed Kurdish
troops to Baghdad. These
troops played a decisive role in the success of the surge.
Last month I once again visited Baghdad to meet with the
leadership of the federal government. We stressed our
commitment to developing an Iraqi state that abides by its
constitution and that is based upon a federal model with
clearly delineated powers for its regions.
In spite of all this, some commentators now suggest that
the Kurds are causing problems by insisting on territorial
demands and proceeding with the development of Kurdistan's
oil resources. These allegations are troubling. We are
proceeding entirely in accord with the Iraqi constitution,
implementing provisions that were brokered by the U.S.
In the constitutional negotiations that took place in the
summer of 2005, two issues were critical to us: first, that
the Kurdistan Region has the right to develop the oil on its
territory, and second, that there be a fair process to
determine the administrative borders of Iraq's Kurdistan
Region--thus resolving once and for all the issue of
``disputed'' territories.
Unfortunately, ever since the discovery of oil in Iraq in
the 1920s, successive Iraqi governments have sought to keep
oil out of Kurdish hands, blocking exploration and
development of fields in Kurdistan. Saddam Hussein's
government went even further, using Iraqi oil revenues to
finance the military campaigns that destroyed more than 4,500
Kurdish villages and to pay for the poison gas used to kill
thousands of Kurdish civilians.
The Kurdish leadership agreed to a U.S.-sponsored
compromise in 2005 in which the central government would have
the authority to manage existing oil fields, but new fields
would fall under the exclusive jurisdiction of the regions.
Since then, the KRG has taken the lead with Baghdad in
negotiations on a hydrocarbon law that is faithful to Iraq's
constitution and is conducive to modernizing Iraq's oil
infrastructure and substantially increasing its oil
production.
We have awarded contracts for foreign oil companies
(including some American ones) to explore our territory. In
so doing, Kurdistan is not threatening the unity of Iraq. It
is simply implementing the constitution.
The ``disputed territories'' have a tragic history. Since
the 1950s, Iraqi regimes encouraged Arabs to settle in Kirkuk
and other predominantly Kurdish and Turkmen areas. Saddam
Hussein accelerated this process by engaging in ethnic
cleansing, expelling or killing Kurds and Turkmen, or by
requiring nationality corrections (in which non-Arabs are
forced to declare themselves to be Arabs) and by moving Arabs
into Kurdish homes.
The dispute between Baghdad and the Kurds over Kirkuk has
lasted more than 80 years and has often been violent. All
sides have now agreed to a formula to resolve the problem, to
bring justice to Kirkuk, and to correct the crimes against
Kurds committed by Saddam Hussein's regime. Iraq's
constitution requires that a referendum be held in disputed
territories to determine if their populations want to join
the Kurdistan Region. Conducting a plebiscite is not easy,
but it is preferable to another 80 years of conflict.
If the pro-Kurdistan side should lose the referendum in
Kirkuk, I promise that Kurdistan will respect that result.
And if they win, I promise that we will do everything in our
power to ensure outsized representation of Kirkuk's Turkmen,
Arabs and Christians both on the local level and in the
parliament and government of the Kurdistan Region.
Regional stability cannot come from resolving internal
disputes alone. That is why expanding and deepening our ties
with Turkey is my top priority.
My meeting last month in Baghdad with the Turkish special
envoy to Iraq was a historic and positive development. There
should be further direct contacts between the KRG and Turkey,
as well as multilateral contacts that involve the U.S. We are
eager to work with Turkey to seek increased peace and
prosperity in the region.
I am proud that the Kurdistan Region is both a model and
gateway for the rest of Iraq. Our difficult path to a
secular, federal democracy is very much inspired by the U.S.
And so we look forward to working with the Obama-Biden
administration to support and defend our hard-fought
successes in Iraq, and to remain proud of what the Kurdistan
region is today: a thriving civil society in the heart of the
Middle East. When we insist on strict compliance with our
country's constitution, we are only following America's great
example.