Mr. Speaker, it is an honor to come before the House once again. I want to thank the Democratic leader, Nancy Pelosi, and also the Democratic leadership, Steny Hoyer, Mr. James Clyburn and Mr. John Larson, who is our Vice Chair. I must…
Mr. Speaker, it is an honor to come before the House once again. I want to thank the Democratic leader, Nancy Pelosi, and also the Democratic leadership, Steny Hoyer, Mr. James Clyburn and Mr. John Larson, who is our Vice Chair.
I must say, there is so much to talk about tonight. Not only Members of Congress know there is serious business to discuss as it relates to the new revelations on what is happening in Iraq and the war in Iraq, but also I think it is a reflection on the lack of oversight here in this House.
I think the American people need to be very concerned about what has not happened here on this floor, in committee, in subcommittees, and as it relates to the leadership making sure that our men and women in harm's way not only have what they need in the field, need it in Afghanistan, where they are undermanned and under gun at this particular time, but due to the training of Coalition Forces many are able to protect themselves, but they need more.
In the war in Iraq, a number of unfortunate events are taking place on a daily basis. A number of Marines were lost over the weekend, and we are in our last week of session. I think that the lack of oversight and diplomacy at the same time has resulted in a new insurgence that has been created in Iraq.
I must say that Karen D. Young of the Washington Post on Sunday wrote about this. I think it is important to read it. It was on the front page. I think it is important that Members pay close attention to that and provide the kind of oversight that is needed.
I am glad to be joined by the 30-Something Working Group, Mr. Bill Delahunt, better known as Uncle Bill, Mr. Tim Ryan, who is still injured but on the floor because this is our last time before the election to be able to let the Members and the American people know what has not happened in this House. We are also joined by Ms. Wasserman Schultz, who is my good friend and served in the district next to me in Florida.
I yield to Congressman Delahunt.
I can tell you, Mr. Delahunt, and with Mr. Ryan being here, as we are both members of the Armed Services Committee, of course there hasn't been a hearing.
Mr. Delahunt, if I may, I just want to top shelf my rubber stamp again. It would be going against the philosophy of the rubber-stamp Republican majority to have such a hearing because, A, it would be embarrassing for the administration, and at the same time, embarrassing for this Congress. Things have gotten so out of control to the point to where there is not a great discussion on new members of the coalition. Have you heard that recently, that we have new countries that are coming to the coalition in the war in Iraq? No. They are not. The only new members of the coalition in the war in Iraq are U.S. contractors that are there because they are the second largest force there.
I think Mr. Ryan, when he pointed out this article that was in the Washington Post on Sunday by Karen DeYoung, I mean, there is a lot here, Mr. Speaker, even in the New York Times and even on television and even by active generals that are in the military now and those that are retired that are saying we need help, we need leadership.
When the President and this Congress punts to the military commanders on diplomacy, we have General Casey over there being the State Department and the Defense Department at the same time. We have career service State Department employees that have trained their entire lives for working out these kinds of issues. And when we put forth proposals as it relates to redeployment, taking the training wheels off the Iraqi Government and the military, there are those on the other side saying ``stay the course.'' Okay. Let us talk about staying the course.
Mr. Ryan read something and I just want to read it again. It is out of this article. You can go on Washingtonpost.com. It is what it is. This is not something that we have put together. We have this National Intelligence Estimate that is a draft report, Mr. Delahunt, a draft. What is going to happen when the real report comes out after the November elections? Let me just read some of the things in the article. They are stating the obvious. I mean, are you tired? Do you need any more? That is obvious here, it is the obvious that they are stating here. More than 5,000 radical Islamic Web sites are spreading the message that the Iraq war is a Western attempt to take over Islam and establish a permanent presence in the Middle East. They are calling the United States crusaders because the President is saying ``stay the course.'' That is all he is saying, ``stay the course.'' By ourselves.
Now, I just want to digress here for a minute to say that being on the Armed Services Committee, you have to pay attention to what is happening in the
committee. We get our staff that writes reports even on meetings when the staff attends staff meetings, and I just remember yesterday, after the elections, the administration and our top commanders in Iraq and a number of members of the majority said, oh, yes, we will be able to take the troop levels down after the election. Yes, we will send a number of people back home. General Abizaid came out just a week ago, last week, and said that we have 147,000 troops in Iraq right now and maybe, maybe by the spring we will send 7,000 back.
Now, I am going to tell you this right now, Mr. Delahunt, Ms. Wasserman Schultz, and Mr. Ryan. I am no prophet and I am definitely not a psychic, but I am going to tell you this: if you keep doing the same thing expecting different results, it is not going to get us to where we need to be. This is the outfit, Ms. Wasserman Schultz, as I close, that said that we are going looking for weapons of mass destruction, that there are weapons of mass destruction out there. So under the administration when it was proven wrong, they then flipped the script and said, well, now it is the war, the war on terror, the global war on terror.
This is a war in Iraq. The war on terror is in Afghanistan. And this report, it is not a Democratic report. These are intelligence clandestine experts that are career service individuals that have said that we have more terror and it is an incubator for terrorism throughout the world.
So I think it is very, very important that we take note of this. And it is very, very important that we do not take this lightly.
Ms. Wasserman Schultz, this is not something as it relates to the Democrats proving a point. This is not about proving a point. This is about America. This is about the United States of America. This is about the safety of United States citizens and those that live within the borders of the United States and those that are abroad of our future, and better yet this administration is saying, stay the course with very little or no oversight
This has now gone far beyond party loyalty. I mean, this is when you take off your partisan hat, and you have to say this is for protection of not only the U.S. troops but also the people of the United States of America.
Very quickly, I just say that here is another article, September 25, 2006, by I believe it is Peter Spiegel. I mean, the bottom line is that the Army has now alerted or withheld or what have you or the Pentagon withheld, we do not know, because even as Members of Congress this has been noted as one of the most secretive administrations in the history of the United States of America. The reason why they have been very secretive in classifying everything is that the Congress has not demanded more, not only for Members of Congress such as myself who serve on two national security committees here, either be Homeland Security Committee as the ranking member of the Subcommittee on Oversight or a member of several subcommittees in Armed Services.
So, when we read about these things, we have to read about it in the paper. They did not elect us to come up here and read the paper just like the average American and expect us to govern because we do not have an opportunity to govern here because the Republicans are in the majority, and they continue this kind of atmosphere.
The Army right now, they need additional billions to be able to keep up with what is happening in the war in Iraq and other commitments not only throughout the world but domestically. So, if something were to happen, whether it be China or Iran, there would be serious issues for us.
So, when you see these two leaders of not only Iraq and Iran come together at the U.S. taxpayers' expense, I mean this is something we need to pay very close attention to.
I am going to keep it very simple and I am going to yield because there is not a lot that I want to say tonight because I am truly upset about the fact that this continues to happen. The only disruption in this streamline of policy-making or lack thereof is that we have the majority in this House. There has to be a Democratic majority in this House to bring balance to our democracy.
Stay the course just because they say it does not mean it is the truth. We are winning in Iraq. Okay. They have said it so it means we are winning in Iraq, okay, even though you have national experts as it relates to the clandestine organizations not only in this country but abroad that are saying we are stimulating more terrorism than we are tearing down terrorism.
We have the 9/11 Commission that has put forth recommendations to make America safer, but this Republican majority will not adopt those recommendations.
We have individuals that are on their fifth and sixth deployment, need it be a soldier or a Marine or a Coast Guard or a sailor or a pilot in the U.S. Air Force, on their fourth and fifth deployment, and then we have the administration say stay the course, and we have the rubber stamp Congress say, yeah, yeah, stay the course.
Then we come up with recommendations on redeployment and hopefully working with other countries in securing not only Iraq but telling Iraq, listen, you have to secure your own country. You have on average 60 Iraqis dying a day, three to four U.S. Armed Forces dying a day. And so we are saying stay the course? It is very simple. What more do we need?
We are borrowing more from foreign Nations than we ever borrowed before, $1.05 trillion versus $1.01 trillion, 42 Presidents, 224 years of history before us.
We have got the past Speaker, Republican Speaker, it is not a Democrat,
that is saying, ``They are seen by the country as being in charge of a government that cannot function.''
Mr. Speaker, Speaker Gingrich is the individual who brought about, quote, unquote, the Republican revolution that is calling the Republican majority ``they,'' and it goes on and on and on, need it be the gas companies that are making record profits. Look, rubber stamp Congress, $113 billion.
Or need it be in congressional increases in salaries like Mr. Ryan pointed out. Individuals are being rewarded for mediocrity, for saying, okay, well, as long as I am with the team and I am loyal to the President of the United States and I am loyal to the Republican majority, I am going to move up in the company. Well, guess what, this is not a company. This is the government of the United States of America.
Of the people. The U.S. taxpayer. We have individuals that are being placed in new positions. What do you think in the Pentagon? Well, if you go with your training, with your education and your experience and talk about a post-Iraq plan or talk about standing up to the boss or talk about maybe saying, well, excuse me, I know that you have your plan and all, but you know, we need X, that you are making a career decision in this government?
So just for balance we need a Democratic House. We need a Democratic Congress that will bring balance and will ask the ``but'' question or maybe we need to call this individual in and understand more about things because we are the individuals that are elected to represent the people of the United States of America, not Republican, not Democrats, not Independents, but the people of the United States of America. Until we have that, we are not going to have a true democracy. We are not going to have balance. We are not going to have level thinking. We are not going to have the direction that our men and women need on the ground. We are not going to have the accountability that the Constitution calls for, that Mr. Ryan always talks about in article I, section 1. We are not going to have that until we do away with this Republican rubber stamp Congress.
I do not care if individuals who want to follow me, Mr. Speaker, in a 30-second ad to talk about somebody voted one way or another. The facts are that America is more in danger than it was prior to the invasion of Iraq and fiscally in a worse situation in borrowing from nations that we have never borrowed from at the level that we are borrowing from at this present time.
We can talk about articles. We can talk about all these things. The facts are that the experts are saying one thing. It is like going to the doctor and the doctor said, you know, you have a really bad virus. Are you going to stand there and question the doctor? Are you going to say, well, you know, well, I do not have a virus, Republican majority tells me it is just an allergy, I am going to be okay? No. You are not.
So we have the 9/11 Commission that is saying one thing, that are professionals that spent months and months and months, staff, millions of dollars, had the President and other folks going to testify before them. We have this National Security Council that have pulled themselves together, that have released this report, and we have Members on the Republican side, oh, they do not know what they are doing; it is just a draft report. It is going to be a draft until after the election.
So I think the American people, Mr. Speaker, are going to be paying attention to the obvious. This is not just party rhetoric. We are far beyond that at this point.
I am just going to put it to you this way. Anyone that speaks the truth, some may say truth to power, those individuals that are trained, that are educated, that have been in the Armed Services as the two-star general has been, and has anything to say about the Pentagon or the direction that we are going in will not and have not, since making that statement, anything to say before the Committee on Armed Services.
Do we want to call them in to kind of learn from them individuals, not the Republican majority? The Republican majority are loyal to the rubber stamp, not to the truth.
Could you give the web site, Mr. Ryan.