Mr. Speaker, pursuant to House Resolution 950, I call up the bill (H.R. 3967) to improve health care and benefits for veterans exposed to toxic substances, and for other purposes, and ask for its immediate consideration in the House. Mr.…
Mr. Speaker, pursuant to House Resolution 950, I call up the bill (H.R. 3967) to improve health care and benefits for veterans exposed to toxic substances, and for other purposes, and ask for its immediate consideration in the House.
Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks and to insert extraneous material on H.R. 3967, as amended.
Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of H.R. 3967, as amended, the Honoring our PACT Act of 2021.
When we sent our servicemembers into harm's way, we made a pact to care for them when they came home. But for too long, Congress and the Department of Veterans Affairs have been slow to accept responsibility and cost of that care, citing high costs or lack of absolute, scientific proof of illness connections to service. The result is a disability claims process that is cumbersome and places the burden of proof for toxic exposure on veterans themselves.
Every day more and more veterans speak out about exposure to environmental hazards and other toxic substances during their military service.
Recently, I put out a call encouraging toxic exposed veterans to share their experiences with the House Veterans' Affairs Committee. We heard from thousands of veterans in 49 States. These reflections are very powerful, Mr. Speaker, and I would like to share some of them with you now.
Navy veteran Ed described how toxic exposures overwhelmed his senses. He wrote: ``You could not escape the jet fuel. You could see it, smell it, and taste it.''
I heard from Marine veteran Mike who said: ``Even when we weren't actively engaged in dumping items into the burn pit, we were still exposed.''
Air Force veteran Christopher R. described his dealings with VA stating: ``I continue to be rejected because they say that it is impossible to prove that it is service related. I never worked with chemicals before my service or since. I feel like a nuisance to the VA health system.''
I heard from a widow of Army veteran Austin Monk who said: ``No wife should have to bury her 22-year-old husband because of his exposure to unsafe conditions while in service to his country.''
These stories are heart-wrenching and frustrating. Our veterans are fighting their own government to grant them the care and benefits they have earned.
We should be outraged listening to these stories, and it should be clear how urgent passing the Honoring our PACT Act is for our veterans. Veterans and veterans service organizations agree.
Mr. Speaker, I include in the Record letters of support from more than 42 veterans service organizations.
February 24, 2022.
Hon. Nancy Pelosi,
Speaker,
House of Representatives.
Hon. Kevin McCarthy,
Minority Leader,
House of Representatives.
Dear Speaker Pelosi and Minority Leader McCarthy: On behalf
of the American service members and veterans we represent,
the undersigned representatives of our respective Veterans
and Military Service Organizations call on the House to
expeditiously consider and pass into law the Honoring Our
PACT Act (H.R. 3967).
Throughout our history, and most recently over the course
of more than 20 years of war in the post-9/11 era, service
members and veterans suffered prolonged exposure to dangerous
toxic substances, such as burn pits that destroyed trash,
medical and human waste, chemicals, and fuel, in and around
the battlefields of Iraq, Afghanistan and other places. Of
the hundreds of thousands of our members who have suffered
these exposures, many have returned home sick (or would
become ill), and many have also died of their injuries.
Collectively, we have spent years educating Congress,
national leaders, and the public on the enormous scope of the
injuries faced by our community. There have been small-scale
measures to boost education, training, research, and outreach
to begin to address the problem. Over the last several years,
many of our organizations have worked together to assemble
the components of comprehensive toxic exposure legislation
that provides VA health care, a new process to determine
future presumptive conditions, and provide overdue disability
benefits to thousands of veterans from all wars and eras
suffering from toxic exposures.
There have been a number of bills introduced in the House
that address different aspects of the toxic exposures puzzle,
however the Honoring Our PACT Act is the only bill that
provides a truly comprehensive solution. Although many of us
have supported some of these other burn pits and toxic
exposure bills, none of them provides a complete and lasting
solution for veterans who are or may become ill as a result
of toxic exposures. Consequently, when the Honoring Our PACT
Act is brought to the floor for consideration, if any such
legislation is offered as an amendment or motion to restrict
or substitute, rather than supplement, the underlying bill,
we would urge all members to oppose such amendments or
motions.
Our organizations call on the House to pass the Honoring
Our PACT Act without further delay, to finally provide those
who have laid their lives on the line for all Americans with
the health care and benefits they need and deserve.
Sincerely,
Air Force Sergeants Association (AFSA), Association of
Military Surgeons of the United States (AMSUS), Army Aviation
Association of America, Burn Pits 360, California Communities
Against Toxics, Cease Fire Campaign, Commissioned Officers
Association of the USPHS, Disabled American Veterans (DAV),
Dixon Center for Military and Veterans Services, Enlisted
Association of the National Guard of the United States
(EANGUS), Environmental Working Group (EWG), Fleet Reserve
Association (FRA), Gold Star Wives of America, GO2 Foundation
for Lung Cancer.
Green Beret Foundation, Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of
America (IAVA), Jewish War Veterans of the USA, Service
Women's Action Network (SWAN), Military Chaplains
Association, Military Officers Association of America (MOAA),
Military Order of the Purple Heart (MOPH), Military-Veterans
Advocacy, Minority Veterans of America, National Association
of County Veterans Service Officers, National Military Family
Association (NMFA), National Veterans Legal Services Program
(NVLSP), Naval Enlisted Reserve Association (NERA), Non
Commissioned Officers Association (NCOA).
Paralyzed Veterans of America (PVA), Reserve Organization
of America (ROA), Student Veterans of America (SVA), Task
Force Dagger Foundation, The American Legion, The Enlisted
Association (TREA), Tragedy Assistance Program for Survivors
(TAPS), United Soldiers and Sailors of America, United States
Army Warrant Officers Association, Veteran Warriors, Veterans
of Foreign Wars (VFW), Veterans Prostate Cancer Awareness,
Vietnam Veterans of America VVA), Wounded Warrior Project
(WWP).
Mr. Speaker, I wish to thank Nancy Pelosi, our Speaker, for her commitment to bring this bill to the floor. After years of diligent input from my colleagues, our staff, VA, VSOs, and toxic- exposed veterans themselves, I am confident that we are bringing the best possible version of this bill up for a vote.
The administration agrees and has stated that it ``strongly supports'' this legislation.
Mr. Speaker, I include in the Record the Statement of Administrative Policy for H.R. 3967.
Statement of Administration Policy
H.R. 3967--Honoring Our Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics (PACT)
Act--Rep. Takano, D-California and 100 cosponsors
The Administration strongly supports H.R. 3967, which would
expand veterans' access to health care and benefits to
address the health effects of harmful environmental exposures
that occurred during military service.
The President believes that our Nation has only one truly
sacred obligation: to properly prepare and equip our service
members when we send them into harm's way and to care for
them and their families when they return home. Far too often,
military service comes with a cost, and we owe it to our
veterans and their families to address these consequences
comprehensively. Unfortunately, it has taken decades to
understand the deleterious effects of environmental
exposures--leaving too many without access to the benefits
and services they need.
H.R. 3967 would make changes to the definitions for who is
eligible for VA health care based on presumed toxic exposure
during military service, including from burn pits, radiation,
or other environmental conditions. H.R. 3967 would also make
changes to the Department of Veteran Affairs (VA's) process
for determining presumptive service connection and mandate
several research studies related to military related
environmental exposures. It would also establish new
registries related to exposures, which would provide new data
on the long-term impacts from environmental exposures. H.R.
3697 also would allow a Federal cause of action related to
contaminated water at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina and
establish training requirements for health providers, and
require an outreach plan to educate veterans about their
eligibility for benefits and services related to toxic
exposure.
The Administration looks forward to working with the
Congress to enact this legislation and ensuring it is
effectively implemented. We must address the toxic legacy of
environmental exposures sustained by veterans during their
military service and fulfill our sacred obligation to our
veterans, their families, caregivers, and survivors. We must
also ensure that VA has the resources it needs to implement
this legislation.
Mr. Speaker, I include in the Record a letter of support from The Independence Fund.
The Independence Fund,
February 23, 2022.
Hon. Mark Takano,
Chair, House Committee on Veterans Affairs,
Washington, DC.
Hon. Mike Bost,
Ranking Member, House Committee on Veterans Affairs,
Washington, DC.
Dear Chairman Takano and Ranking Member Bost: The
Independence Fund endorses the Honoring Our PACT Act (H.R.
3976) and urges its quickest adoption by the full House of
Representatives. We further urge the House to engage the
Senate with an appropriate legislative vehicle to get a
House-Senate conference started as soon as possible to work
out a final legislative solution this spring.
The Independence Fund's been proud to join with Wounded
Warrior Project, Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America,
and numerous other veteran organizations through the Toxic
Exposure in the American Military (TEAM) Coalition since
August of 2020 and the initial introduction and Senate
passage of the Toxic Exposure in the American Military (TEAM)
Act of 2020 (S. 4393) and has applauded the serious and
intensive work the House Committee on Veterans Affairs
undertook over the last 16 months.
Now, with the potential House passage of H.R. 3967, we
commit to engaging the Senate to pass this bill as soon as
possible, and if necessary, proceed to a Conference Committee
as soon as possible to ensure this bill can be enacted in
this Session of Congress. We will also urge the other veteran
and military serving organizations with which we work to join
us in such an effort collectively.
A veteran The Independence Fund serves, Nick Ooley, joined
the Army in 2007 and deployed to Iraq the following year.
Today, he is unable to run, jog, or even play basketball with
his 11-year-old son. As he details, ``Burn pits were all over
the place. We did convoy security, so we would travel to Al
Taqaddum, Ramadi, Fallujah, Baghdad, all over the place. When
we would drive through or get stationed in those areas, we
would be breathing this smoke all the time. The smoke would
be so thick during the day that the lights would come on like
it was dark.'' But with 78% of all disability claims related
to toxic exposure denied by the VA, disabled veterans are
denied the help they desperately need and deserve.
While The Independence Fund will always support disabled
veterans like Nick through our disabled veteran assistance
programs, the presumptive condition relief and mandated
health care provided in The Honoring Our PACT Act will be a
crucially needed lifeline for these veterans who have given
so much in the defense of our country. We salute your
leadership on this issue and stand ready to assist however we
can in making this the law of the land.
Very Respectfully,
Bob Carey,
Executive Vice President,
Advocacy & Strategy.
Mr. Speaker, it is now time for the Members of this body to answer a simple question: Am I willing to support our troops and honor our Nation's promise to them?
This bill addresses the true cost of war, and opposing it would be a vote against our servicemembers and veterans. Such a vote would be inconsistent with the thank-yous and patriotic displays so many of my colleagues offer on Veterans Day. Veterans want action, and they deserve our action.
We made a promise to deliver comprehensive toxic exposure legislation, and I intend to keep that promise.
The Honoring our PACT Act will address the full scope of issues affecting toxic-exposed veterans' access to VA care and benefits while reforming VA's presumptive decisionmaking process. It will expand VA healthcare eligibility for over 3.5 million veterans exposed to burn pits and establish a presumption of service connection for over 23 respiratory illnesses and cancers. There is no other toxic exposure legislation in Congress like this one in scope or in soundness.
Before I close, I must emphasize something essential. We cannot renege on our responsibility to toxic-exposed veterans because of any perceived sticker shock.
Cries for offsets and pay-fors did not stop Congress from passing a $1.9 trillion tax cut for corporations and the wealthy in 2017. Over the past 20 years, Congress and our country made the choice to spend trillions on other priorities while sending servicemembers into harm's way at the cost of $6.4 trillion.
We know that this Congress is willing to find money when it wants to, as it recently demonstrated by adding $25 billion to the last National Defense Authorization Act. When our country goes to war, we don't nickel and dime the Department of Defense, and we shouldn't try to pinch pennies when it comes to covering the care for toxic-exposed veterans.
We will not stand by and be lectured about fiscal responsibility when we have a moral obligation to America's veterans. And the time to meet that obligation is now.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, it is my honor and privilege to yield 1 minute to the gentlewoman from California (Ms. Pelosi), a person who has done more for veterans in modern times than any other leader of this body.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from California (Mr. Levin), my good friend, who serves as the chair of the Committee on Veterans' Affairs Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Maryland (Mr. Hoyer), the esteemed majority leader of this House.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from New Hampshire (Mr. Pappas), my good friend who serves as chair of the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations for the Veterans' Affairs Committee.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentlewoman from Virginia (Mrs. Luria), my good friend and cosponsor of H.R. 3967. She is the chair of the Disability Assistance and Memorial Affairs Subcommittee and also a veteran herself and former commander of a naval surface ship.
Mr. Speaker, may I inquire as to how much time I have remaining?
Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Indiana (Mr. Mrvan), my good friend who serves as chair of the Subcommittee on Technology Modernization on the Veterans' Affairs Committee.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from California (Mr. Ruiz), my good friend and neighbor in California, someone who has authored a great big section of this bill on our presumptives, a member of the House Veterans' Affairs Committee and an active member on the Disability Assistance and Memorial Affairs Subcommittee.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Georgia (Mr. Bishop), my very good friend who serves as a subcommittee chair on the Appropriations Committee and also a former member of the House Veterans' Affairs Committee.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Texas
(Mr. Castro), my good friend who serves on the Education and Labor Committee and is a member of the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and is a subcommittee chair on the Foreign Affairs Committee.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentlewoman from Connecticut (Mrs. Hayes), my very good friend who serves on the Education and Labor Committee with me and as is the subcommittee chair on the Agriculture Committee.
Mr. Speaker, at this time I yield 2 minutes to the gentlewoman from Florida (Ms. Lois Frankel), my good friend who is a valued member of the Veterans' Affairs Committee, serving on the Subcommittee on Health.
Mr. Speaker, I would like to inquire as to how much time I have remaining.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentlewoman from New York (Ms. Meng), my very good friend who serves on the House Appropriations Committee.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Guam (Mr. San Nicolas), my good friend who serves on the Committee on Financial Services and the Committee on Natural Resources.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 2\1/2\ minutes to the gentleman from the State of California (Mr. Ruiz), my good friend and colleague, the author of the provisions on the 23 presumptions.
Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, to give the final words on the underlying bill, the PACT Act, on my mind is a constituent, a Vietnam veteran named Zack Earp, a distant relative of the great Wyatt Earp.
Zack sacrificed mightily on behalf of our country, and his body trembles today from Parkinsonism, one of the presumptives that got added during the blue water Navy debate. And I was happy to lead the final charge on getting the Blue Water Navy Vietnam Veterans Act across the finish line.
But do you know what? Passage of that bill and its signage into law finally brought justice to our Vietnam veterans who served on naval surface ships on the territorial waters of Vietnam. It was 40 years late, justice 40 years late.
Mr. Speaker, I vowed that this would not happen again. To pass half measures, one-tenth measures, or one-half of 1 percent measures, which is what the minority proposes to do today, as a substitute for a comprehensive bill is simply repeating the history of what we did to our Vietnam veterans. Burn pits are this generation of veterans' Agent Orange.
Mr. Speaker, I say to my friends that we cannot repeat that history. We owe our Vietnam veterans that implicit promise that we would not repeat the history that was done to them.
As for the cost, I hear the other side competing with the President. Let us send more billions of dollars to Ukraine. And I, myself, would support a robust response to Ukraine in terms of money, but where is that same sense of one-upmanship when it comes to taking care of the veterans here in America?
People are falling over each other in this Chamber to get more money to Ukraine. That is the right thing to do, but it is also the right thing to do to take care of our veterans and to finish the unfinished business.
Finally, the science, I am glad to see science is being taken so seriously by the minority after we have seen skepticism about vaccines, skepticism about climate change. Suddenly, we are looking for scientific absolutism about our veterans.
Mr. Speaker, I say to my friends, the science is there. Let's get this done. Let's pass the PACT Act today with a big bipartisan vote.
Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, pursuant to section 3 of House Resolution 950, I rise to offer 23 amendments en bloc to H.R. 3967.
Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support this bipartisan en bloc of amendments, and I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, at this time I yield 2 minutes to the gentlewoman from Missouri (Ms. Bush), my good friend who serves on the Judiciary Committee and the House Oversight and Reform Committee.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentlewoman from Virginia (Ms. Spanberger), my good friend who serves as a subcommittee chair on the Agriculture Committee and as a member of the Foreign Affairs Committee.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. Cartwright), the distinguished subcommittee chair of the Appropriations Committee.
Mr. Speaker, I have no further speakers and I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, I ask all my colleagues to join me in supporting these 23 amendments en bloc, and I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to the amendment.
Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, I rise in strong opposition to Ranking Member Bost's substitute offered in his absence by Representative Miller-Meeks.
I want to be clear about what this substitute is and what it is not. The ranking member has offered this amendment as the solution to addressing toxic exposure. But it is not that. The substitute amendment is the exact text of a Senator Tester bill which is meant to be the first part of a three-part effort in the Senate.
What Senator Tester has proposed, is doing in three phases what we have done in the PACT Act together. Yet my colleague from Illinois and my colleague from Iowa have taken the work of the Senate without intending to do
any more. This is it. They are representing this as the complete solution which amounts to really a bait and switch.
This substitute amendment would strike the entire PACT Act and replace it with an expansion of existing healthcare eligibility for combat veterans from 5 to 10 years. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that this provision will impact roughly 16,000 veterans over the next 10 years. This is laudable, but let's talk about the math.
Over the past 20 years, 3.5 million servicemembers deployed to areas where they may have been exposed to toxic substances. So the ranking member's amendment would leave behind over 3.4 million veterans.
This is not even a half measure, this substitute, this replacement, that they offer. It is not even one-tenth. It is one-half of 1 percent, a one-half of 1 percent solution compared to the comprehensive bill that we need.
The policy of this amendment is something we agree on. We should enhance eligibility for combat veterans which is why we included the language in the bill before you today, Mr. Speaker. However, it only covers less than half a percentage point of the number of veterans who would be covered under PACT.
My colleague is asserting that less than one-half of a percentage point is enough to be done and then walk away?
The math does not add up, and veterans know it. That is why over 42 veterans service organizations are supporting the PACT Act. Again, I reference the letters previously inserted into the Record.
During the President's State of the Union Address last night, he highlighted the importance of this topic citing his own family tragedy and the loss of his son, Beau, to brain cancer after his military service. He called on Congress to ``pass a law to make sure veterans devastated by toxic exposures in Iraq and Afghanistan finally get the benefits and comprehensive healthcare they deserve.''
Let me repeat that: pass a law to make sure veterans devastated by toxic exposures in Iraq and Afghanistan finally get the benefits and comprehensive healthcare they deserve.
The Bost substitute is far from comprehensive. In fact, it is a fraction of what our veterans have earned and deserve.
It is time we honored our pact to our veterans. That is why I implore my colleagues to reject this incremental measure and join me in supporting the only comprehensive toxic-exposure legislation that delivers on our sacred promise, the PACT Act.
Mr. Speaker, how much time do I have remaining?
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, I yield the balance of my time to the gentlewoman from Texas (Ms. Jackson Lee), who is my good friend and who serves on the Budget Committee, the Homeland Security Committee, and as the chair of the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security on the Judiciary Committee.
Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague, the chair of the Subcommittee on Health.
Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of the Brownley-Miller-Meeks amendment. Women who have served in the military are 20 to 40 percent more likely to develop breast cancer than women who have never served. It is believed that it is due to exposure to radiation and other carcinogens while serving. It is therefore critical that VA ensure all veterans who have served in locations associated with toxic exposure have access to prompt, high-quality breast imaging services to detect breast cancer early.
This amendment would ensure just that. Any eligible veteran who was deployed and exposed to burn pits and airborne hazards would be eligible for mammography screens by the VA. These screenings will save lives.
Furthermore, it requires VA to submit a report to Congress on the rates of breast cancer among those veterans deployed to such toxic environments and compare those rates against their veteran peers who were not exposed, as well as the civilian population.
Mr. Speaker, I urge all my colleagues to support this commonsense amendment.