I, of course, rise in support of H.R. 5326, the Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act 2013. This bill includes over $30 billion for four key agencies under the Science, Space, and Technology Committee's…
I, of course, rise in support of H.R. 5326, the Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act 2013. This bill includes over $30 billion for four key agencies under the Science, Space, and Technology Committee's jurisdiction: the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the National Science Foundation, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
It's a very strong bill, and I want to commend the gentleman from Virginia, Chairman Wolf, for his continued passionate support for science and space issues in a challenging fiscal environment. Mr. Wolf is a true champion of science, and this bill is reflective of that. I also appreciate Chairman Wolf's work to address my concerns and priorities as chairman of the Science, Space, and Technology Committee, and want to highlight a few specific areas of importance to us in this bill.
With regards to NASA, this legislation recognizes the budget realities that we must confront by responsibly imposing measured reductions across the Agency's portfolio. Importantly, this bill maintains development of a new heavy-lift launch system and crew capsule. It maintains a healthy space science enterprise, continues to support innovative aeronautics research, and funds the administration's commercial crew program at the authorized level of $500 million. Our committee will continue to provide oversight on the commercial crew program and work with the appropriators to support a program that has the best chance to succeed on schedule, with appropriate safeguards for the crew, and with the best use of taxpayer dollars.
With regards to the National Science Foundation, the modest increase for the Foundation is appropriate, as basic research and development play a critical role in our economic success. I strongly encourage NSF to broadly use this funding for fundamental research which keeps the United States at the very leading edge of discovery and not to blur this essential role with other initiatives that are best left to the private sector.
Chairman Wolf has also worked to sustain the programs of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST, that directly benefit our Nation's competitiveness. The critical link between fundamental measurement science and our economic success allows NIST to innovate new ways to help U.S. companies excel within a global marketplace and create high-paying jobs.
With respect to NOAA, I thank Chairman Wolf for his continued strong support and oversight of NOAA's satellite programs and for his efforts to restore balance to NOAA's research portfolio. The bill does this, in part, by redirecting the administration's proposed significant increases for climate science to higher priority weather research that will help to protect lives and property through improved severe-weather forecasting. This topic is important to all regions of our Nation and, most recently, to northeast Texas, where an outbreak of tornadoes and severe weather in April caused significant damage to homes and property, including in my home county in Royse City. Regarding these weather research priorities, I hope to work with you as the bill moves to conference to preserve and enhance this particular NOAA priority.
House of Representatives, Committee on Science, Space,
and Technology,
Washington, DC, April 17, 2012.
Hon. Frank Wolf,
Chairman, Commerce, Justice, Science and Related Agencies
Appropriations Subcommittee, House Appropriations
Committee, U.S. Capitol, Washington, DC.
Dear Chairman Wolf: On April 2, President Obama delivered a
speech highly critical of the recently passed House
Republican budget. The speech included the direct and serious
charge that approval of the Republican budget will result in
degraded storm warnings. Specifically, the President stated:
``Over time, our weather forecasts would become less
accurate because we wouldn't be able to afford to launch new
satellites. And that means governors and mayors would have to
wait longer to order evacuations in the event of a
hurricane.''
I object to the President's characterization of this issue,
and believe it is important that we set the record straight
with respect to the origin, outlook, and mitigating options
associated with the potential weather satellite data gap
referenced by the President. More importantly, I would like
to work with you in our respective leadership roles on the
relevant authorizing and appropriating Committees to redirect
questionable priorities in the President's budget and place a
greater emphasis on saving lives and property through
improved weather forecasting. Recent tornado outbreaks across
the country--including in and around my Congressional
district and Northeast Texas--serve as a reminder of the
importance of accurate and timely severe storm forecasts.
As you know, the Science, Space, and Technology Committee's
fiscal year 2013 (FY13) Views and Estimates (V&E)
communicated general concerns with and recommendations
regarding the President's budget request for the National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). These views
were delivered to the Budget Committee on March 9, 2012.
However, in light of the President's remarks, as well as
NOAA's failure to send Congress its budget until March 19--
ten days after the Budget Committee V&E deadline--I believe
it is important to reiterate and expand upon key concerns
with the President's budget.
Regarding the President's suggestion that the Republican
budget will result in a satellite data gap, the Committee
views explicitly addressed this issue, noting:
[T]he Committee remains extremely concerned about the
potential for a data gap between the time that NPP expires
and the first JPSS satellite is launched in 2018.
Furthermore, the Committee does not agree with NOAA's
characterization of the gap as a result of insufficient
funding in prior fiscal years. For years, this program and
its predecessor have been plagued with cost over-runs, poor
management, agency infighting, technical problems and
contractor mistakes. The program restructuring in 2010
increased costs and delayed the program schedule.
Furthermore, in the two years since the Administration
announced the separation of the original program, NOAA has
not re-baselined the JPSS budget as required under P.L. 110
161 and P.L. 109 155. This inaction and delay is troubling,
and significantly hinders the Committee's ability to conduct
proper oversight and undertake a complete assessment of the
program's future. Additionally, the Committee is extremely
concerned that NOAA has not developed a viable plan for
acquiring necessary data if the gap materializes as expected.
The Committee recommends an immediate focus on such an effort
and believes that any such plan should be developed in a
scientific manner, utilizing the resources and expertise of
other NOAA line offices.
These concerns remain and provide important context to the
President's misleading charges. Additionally, it is important
to note that while the Joint Polar Satellite System the
President refers to is a key component of two- to five-day
forecasts, significant increases in warning times for
tornadoes must come from better models, advanced radar
technology, and more measurements from ground-based and
aerial sensors that directly measure wind speed, direction,
temperature and moisture. These relatively inexpensive Earth-
bound observing and computing systems provide the most vital
information for severe storm forecasting, and are
unfortunately the types of systems President Obama is
actually proposing to cut.
Finally, I believe the President's request misses critical
opportunities to advance much higher priority weather-related
research and technology development that will increase the
accuracy and timeliness of severe storm forecasting,
ultimately improving protection of American lives and
property. Instead, the Administration has chosen to direct
virtually all of its $29 million (7.6 percent) increase for
Oceanic and Atmospheric Research to climate research. In
fact, proposed FY 2013 climate spending of $213 million is
over $60 million more than the level approved by your
Subcommittee in last year's House-passed appropriations bill.
Simply diverting some of this increase for climate research
to research on Earth-based observing systems and development
of weather forecasting innovations would greatly improve
allocation of taxpayer resources and pay important dividends
to the country. In particular, I recommend a shift of funding
of $13 million to the President's anemic weather research
request of less than $70 million for the following four
areas:
1. Unmanned Aircraft Systems ($6 million), which will allow
for testing and use of instruments to significantly enhance
atmospheric observations, particularly in severe weather such
as hurricanes and tornadoes.
2. Graphic Processing Unit (GPU) supercomputing R&D ($5
million) to enable weather forecast models to run much faster
and more accurately with significantly greater detail.
3. Weather radar advanced algorithm and software
development ($2 million) to maximize the utility and use of
new dual-polarization radar hardware capabilities.
4. Observing System Simulation Experiments (OSSEs $3
million) to objectively and quantitatively assess the
potential benefit of alternative weather data systems to
improve global weather prediction, hurricane track intensity
and forecasting, tornado warning times, and the prediction of
local severe storm outbreaks. At a recent SST Committee
hearing, a broad cross-section of stakeholders recommended
NOAA fund OSSEs to better guide weather data system decision-
making and also inform options associated with minimizing the
loss of forecast accuracy in the event of continued satellite
launch delays and resulting gaps.
Although I support maintaining resources for important
climate research activities such as the National Integrated
Drought Information System, I would also recommend an
additional shifting of funding of $10 million from climate
research to the National Weather Service to fund observing
systems such as the NOAA Profiler Network and the National
Mesonet. These on-the-ground systems have already proven
vital for providing
data increasing the accuracy of short-term weather forecasts
and severe storm warnings.
Taken together, these initiatives, with a small relative
cost paid for by simply diverting a portion of the
President's requested increase for climate research, could
provide tremendous returns in terms of lives saved, out-year
budget savings and the avoidance of billions of dollars in
property loss and damage.
Thank you for considering this important request. I look
forward to working closely with you as you develop and
advance the FY13 Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related
Agencies appropriations legislation.
Sincerely,
Rep. Ralph M. Hall,
Chairman.