Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011
Mr. Chairman, I move to strike the last word. I rise in support of the amendment that Mr. Flake has proposed, and I rise in strong opposition to the underlying CR. Mr. Chairman, the consequence of this whole discussion about dealing with…
Mr. Chairman, I move to strike the last word.
I rise in support of the amendment that Mr. Flake has proposed, and I rise in strong opposition to the underlying CR.
Mr. Chairman, the consequence of this whole discussion about dealing with the deficit and the budget reduction that is being recommended by the Republicans is going to be jobs. If you look at what is being proposed, the other side has had nearly 2 months but has brought zero bills that create jobs. These cuts amount to 1 million jobs that will be lost.
There will be no jobs for nurses. $51 million will be cut from the National Park Service; that is a loss of jobs. $256
million will be cut from State and Federal law enforcement; that is the local police that will be cut. $889 million will be cut from renewable energy programs; those are jobs creating solar panels and outfitting and retrofitting homes so they will be energy-efficient. $1 billion will be cut from the National Institutes of Health, which will be a loss of jobs in research and in providing direct public health care to the American citizens. $1.3 billion will be cut from community health centers; that means no jobs and increased costs in the emergency rooms, where people with very acute illnesses will be--people who will not be able to find health care because they will have nowhere else to go. There will be cuts in rural development--a loss of jobs. There will be a $1.6 billion cut for the Environmental Protection Agency--a loss of jobs. There will be a $96 million cut for substance abuse and mental health services--a loss of jobs.
One of the realities is that we must invest. It has been said over and over again that the point of dealing with this deficit that we have in this country has to be a pragmatic, measured process. It has taken us 10 years to get into the hole that we are in, and we need to plan to get out of that with the same amount of time, if not more.
We also need to talk about revenue generation. We are not going to cut our way out of this deficit, and you are certainly not going to cut your way out of this deficit when you are only concentrating on 14 or 15 percent of the Federal budget, which is why I support this amendment as it is an attempt to deal with defense.
We must create revenues. We must quit giving huge subsidies to Big Oil and Big Gas. We must ask mining companies, for once, to begin to pay royalties on the extractions provided them by the public lands. We must close the corporate loopholes that exist that created the financial collapse of housing in this country, and we must ask Wall Street to pay its fair share through a transaction fee, which will generate billions and billions of dollars for the taxpayers of this country.
In order to deal with this deficit, there must be a corresponding generation of revenue so we can continue to invest in the things that are important to the American people: their families, their lives, their education, their health care, their futures. That is an investment, and with additional revenue we will be able to begin to cut the deficit.
The continuing resolution is not an effort to deal with the deficit. It is a calculation to deal with programs and projects that have helped the middle class succeed, poor people survive, the disabled endure. They are programs and projects that have made this country stronger with their support for education and health care.
I urge all of my colleagues to vote against the continuing resolution.
Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my time.