Madam Speaker, I wish to submit the following earmark for the Record. Requesting Member: Congressman Robin Hayes. Bill Number: H.R. 5658, The Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2009. Account: Other Procurement…
Madam Speaker, I wish to submit the following earmark for the Record.
Requesting Member: Congressman Robin Hayes.
Bill Number: H.R. 5658, The Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2009.
Account: Other Procurement Army (OPA), Training Devices--Non-System.
Legal Name of Requesting Entity: General Dynamics Information Technology.
Address of Requesting Entity: 2941 Fairview Park Dr., Suite 100, Falls Church, VA 22041.
Description of Request: This request is for authorization of $4 million FY `09 OPA funding to allow instrumentation of 12 to 14 of the remaining buildings at the Range 74 Combined Arms Collective Training Facility (CACTF) site to Combined Arms MOUT Task Force (CAMTF) standard. The Army's CAMTF training requirement provides 80 percent coverage for a generic 20-26 building site. The Ft. Bragg Range 74 CACTF consists of thirty-two (32) training buildings, only six (or 18%) of which are instrumented. Ft. Bragg's CACTF supports sixteen (16) brigade-equivalent units with six (6) instrumented buildings. Considering the XVIII ABC training throughput, the level of instrumentation currently fielded is not commensurate with the size and scope found at installations with smaller training requirements. Fort Campbell's Cassidy Urban Training Complex and Eighth Army's Rodriguez CACTF in Korea are illustrative of the Army's training strategy and feature at least 18-20 instrumented training buildings, per facility. The situation is more pronounced when you examine the troop populations at each installation. Currently, the Rodriguez site supports one maneuver brigade of the 2nd Infantry Division, while Cassidy hosts three maneuver brigades from the 101st Airborne Division. There is a compelling need to instrument another twelve to fourteen (12-14) buildings at the Ft Bragg CACTF to align it closer to the Army's standard.
Requesting Member: Congressman Robin Hayes.
Bill Number: H.R. 5658, The Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2009.
Account: RDT&E, Navy.
Legal Name of Requesting Entity: Combat Displays, Inc.
Address of Requesting Entity: 100-B Industrial Drive, New Bern, NC 28562.
Description of Request: Provide an authorization of $6,800,000 for development of environmentally sealed, ruggedized avionics displays for vertical lift systems and will be done in conjunction with the Center for Vertical Lift Excellence, Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) Cherry Point, NC in support of technology to benefit our military aviators. This request is consistent with the intended and authorized purpose of the Navy RDT&E account.
Requesting Member: Congressman Robin Hayes.
Bill Number: H.R. 5658, The Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2009.
Account: Defense-Wide Procurement.
Legal Name of Requesting Entity: Raytheon Technical Services Company.
Address of Requesting Entity: 6125 E 21st St., Indianapolis, IN 46219-2058.
Description of Request: Provide an authorization of $6,000,000 to procure 80 RAMS B kits for Special Operations Forces. RAMS is a remote- controller initiator to control the activation of demolitions. This request is consistent with the intended and authorized purpose of the Defense Wide Procurement account. These kits are used extensively by United States Special Operations Command and our servicemembers in OIF and OEF.
Requesting Member: Congressman Robin Hayes.
Bill Number: H.R. 5658, The Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2009.
Account: OPN Budget Activity 01, Line #19, Items Less than $5 million.
Legal Name of Requesting Entity: IMO Pump.
Address of Requesting Entity: 1710 Airport Road, Monroe, NC, USA.
Description of Request: Provide an authorization of $4 million for the procurement and installation of Canned Lube Pumps (CLP) on four LSD-41/49 Class amphibious ships. This funding will purchase 16 CLP units to complete the LSD-41 class. Approximately, $400,000 is for technical support for installation; $2.8M for the CLP units and installation; $600, 000 for battle spares; $200,000 for proto-type shipboard test for LHD class. The Navy has indicated that the total savings over the life of the LSD 41/49 class from installing the CLP is over $33.1 million and the return investment to the Navy is 394 percent. This funding will complete the procurement and installation of the Whidbey Island Class.
Requesting Member: Congressman Robin Hayes.
Bill Number: H.R. 5658, The Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2009.
Account: Defense-Wide, RDT & E.
Legal Name of Requesting Entity: University of North Carolina at Charlotte (UNCC) and Northrup Grumman.
Address of Requesting Entity: UNC-Charlotte Campus in Charlotte, NC is the location of performance (where the work will be done): University of North Carolina-Charlotte, 9201 University City Blvd., Charlotte, NC 28223 and Northrup Grumman, 7323 Aviation Blvd., Mail Stop 1105, Baltimore, MD 21040.
Description of Request: Provide a $3 million authorization for Superlattice Nanotechnology research for the Department of Defense to be performed at UNC-Charlotte. Most of today's compound semiconductor devices made from silicon (Si) and silicon germanium (SiGe) have high power capabilities, but are limited by defect density and other factors affecting yield, cost and performance. One of the most promising new materials is SiC, which is used to make high power radio frequency (RF), power switching, and high current switching devices for a multitude of DOD applications. Superlattice nanotechnology can mitigate the size, yield and performance limitations of SiC by utilizing atomic level control of the SiC-on-Si growth process. This will greatly reduce the cost and improve the performance of many of the desired SiC devices. Superlattice nanotechnology will form the structure for the next dimension in RF electronics (Radar, EW, communications), radiation hard electronics (satellite, special use), and power conditioning electronics (DEW, electromagnetic gun), enabling performance levels unachievable with today's technology. Request $5.0 million be added to the President's FY09 Budget Request to continue development of silicon carbide (SiC) Superlattice Nanotechnology.
Requesting Member: Congressman Robin Hayes.
Bill Number: H.R. 5658, The Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2009.
Account: Defense-Wide, RDT & E.
Legal Name of Requesting Entity: United Protective Technologies.
Address of Requesting Entity: United Protective Technologies (UPT), 4600 H Lebanon Road, Charlotte, NC 28227 and their Locust, North Carolina facility.
Description of Request: Provide a $2 million authorization for Non- Hazardous Infrared Anti-Reflective Coatings for Army Aircraft Sensors. An alternative coating to extend the service life of expensive and critical infrared range sensor windows is now available. This coating presents none of the health or environmental impacts found in other currently used Anti-reflective coatings. Prototype examples and early stage data of this new capability have been presented to the U.S. Army and have received very positive feedback. Key features include unprecedented environment stability, and excellent abrasion and erosion protection. This coating may also be used on both flat windows and on dome-shaped configurations. This coating will increase the survivability of sensor windows and reduce cost of ownership through an increase in operation life and performance. Army provided Cost/Benefit analysis shows that the windows of the AH-64 Targeting Sensor Array (TADS/PNVS) are currently demonstrating a Mean Time between Unscheduled Removal of 5031 (PNVS) and 5495 (TADS) flight hours. With the current Operational Tempo AH-64's can be expected to fly approximately 100,000 flight hours per year (total fleet). Based on the damage seen on removed windows, a conservative estimate is that this coating will cut unscheduled removals by 50%, saving $41 8,000/year for the
Apache Airframe. Other Army airframes could show a savings amounting to an additional $800,000 annually.