Faa Reauthorization And Reform Act Of 2011
Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk made in order under the rule. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I certainly also want to thank Chairman Mica, as well as Chairman Petri and also Ranking Member Costello, for all of their hard work and…
Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk made in order under the rule.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I certainly also want to thank Chairman Mica, as well as Chairman Petri and also Ranking Member Costello, for all of their hard work and for putting out a bill I think will help us move the Nation forward and improve the quality of aviation in America.
My amendment is designed to help expedite and to improve the process by which FAA works with government agencies to incorporate unmanned aerial vehicles, or UAVs as they're commonly called, into the National Airspace System. Currently, Mr. Chairman, law enforcement agencies across the country, from Customs and Border Protection to local police departments, et cetera, are ready to embrace the new technology and to start utilizing UAVs in the pursuit of enforcing the law and protecting our border as well.
However, the FAA has been very hesitant to give authorization to these UAVs due to limited air space and restrictions that they have. I certainly can appreciate those concerns; but when we're talking about Customs and Border Protection or the FBI, what have you, we are talking about missions of national security. And certainly there's nothing more important than that. It was a very, very lengthy exercise to get the FAA to authorize the use of UAVs on the southern border. While they're finally being utilized down there, we are certainly a long way from fully utilizing these technologies.
So my amendment does three things. First, it makes sure those stakeholders currently using UAVs have a seat at the table during the integration process. Second, my amendment would clear up a source of confusion in this process and direct the FAA to define exactly what it means by ``sense and avoid technology.'' We think this would provide very clear-cut criteria in order to ensure compliance.
Finally, my amendment directs the FAA to conduct the safety studies that it is requiring. Currently, the FAA would direct various agencies to conduct these studies themselves. However, there is no agency in the Federal Government that has the expertise and the competency that FAA has when it comes to studying safety in the air. So I think this would guarantee that the safety studies that the FAA requires for this process are as comprehensive as possible.
As I said before, we do have some domestic UAV missions in effect. There's three in Arizona, there's two in North Dakota, and maritime guardians as well in both Florida and Texas. We've made some progress, but when we have a situation in this Nation where we don't have operational control of either of our borders, either the southern border or the northern border, I think that the taxpayers are well- suited to be able to utilize current DOD technology, off-the-shelf hardware that has already been extremely effectively in theatre with these UAVs to help us with our border protection.
UAVs are ready. They work. I think it's past time we utilize them. We need to have the FAA help us with this kind of thing as well.
I yield to the gentleman from Wisconsin.
I certainly appreciate Chairman Petri's comments on that.
With that, Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my time.