Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 6400) to require the Secretary of Homeland Security to conduct a threat and operational analysis of ports of entry, and for other purposes, as amended. Mr. Speaker, I ask…
Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 6400) to require the Secretary of Homeland Security to conduct a threat and operational analysis of ports of entry, and for other purposes, as amended.
Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days within which to revise and extend their remarks and include any extraneous material on the bill under consideration.
Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, the United States has over 300 official ports of entry, ranging from land border ports along our southern and northern borders to international airports in major metropolitan cities, to seaports ranging from the Great Lakes to coastal cities. While each port facilitates trade and travel that keeps our economy humming, each has their own unique security challenges to prevent illicit activity. That is why it is imperative that we know the vulnerabilities and operational needs at each and every port in order to properly protect our homeland from threats and exploitation.
I introduced this bill because our country's ports are long overdue for a comprehensive review. My bill requires the Department of Homeland Security to do a full threat and operational analysis of these vulnerabilities and create a strategy and implementation plan to prevent human trafficking, illicit drugs, illegal contraband, and transnational criminal activity at our air, land, and sea ports of entry.
The bill also works to improve the flow of commerce that is vital to our economy. We need to not only think about the security of our ports, but also the infrastructure and operational needs as well.
Ports of entry continue to be a preferred location for transnational criminal organizations and drug smugglers to transport illicit drugs and contraband into the United States. In fact, between October 1, 2010, and March 31, 2018, Customs and Border Protection conducted more than 84 million nonintrusive inspection examinations, resulting in more than 19,000 narcotics seizures and $79 million in currency seizures.
Many U.S. ports of entry were built 40 to 50 years ago. Therefore, they were never designed for post-9/11 security measures, technology, or increased volume of traffic. These infrastructure constraints magnify the threats at our ports of entry and manifest themselves as long lines and bottlenecks that strain Customs and Border Protection's ability to properly vet all incoming traffic. In addition, long lines and wait times delay trade and cost the U.S. economy millions of dollars every year in lost productivity.
This is why my bill's required analysis will look over current and potential threats, methods, and pathways used to exploit security vulnerabilities and improvements needed to improve illicit drugs and other contraband from crossing our border. Following the analysis, my bill directs the Department of Homeland Security to create a strategy and implementation plan to address the threats and operational inefficiencies identified. We need to fix these problems. We need to take action. Our ports must be brought into the 21st century.
I am pleased by the support I have received on this legislation, and I specifically want to thank Chairman Brady of the House Ways and Means Committee and Chairman McCaul of the House Homeland Security Committee for working with me to bring this bill to the floor. Modernizing our ports of entry is just one step in securing our border.
Mr. Speaker, I urge all Members to join me in supporting H.R. 6400, and I reserve the balance of my time.
Committee on Ways and Means,
House of Representatives,
Washington, DC, August 31, 2018.
Hon. Michael T. McCaul,
Chairman, Committee on Homeland Security,
Washington, DC.
Dear Chairman McCaul: I write to you regarding H.R. 6400,
the ``United States Ports of Entry Threat and Operational
Review Act.'' The Committee on Ways and Means has
jurisdiction over this bill and an additional referral was
granted to the Committee on Homeland Security. The Committee
on Homeland Security ordered this bill favorably reported.
Because of the extensive communication regarding the policies
contained in the bill, the Committee on Ways and Means is
willing to waive formal consideration of the bill so that it
may proceed expeditiously to the House Floor.
Please note that by waiving formal consideration of the
bill, the Committee on Ways and Means is in no way waiving
its jurisdiction over the subject matter contained in those
provisions of the bills that fall within your Rule X
jurisdiction.
I will include a copy of our letters in the Congressional
Record during consideration of this legislation on the House
floor and would support your effort to seek appointment of an
appropriate number of conferees on any House-Senate
conference involving this legislation.
Sincerely,
Kevin Brady,
Chairman.
Mr. Speaker, I once again urge my colleagues to support H.R. 6400, and I yield back the balance of my time.