For The Relief Of The Parents Of Theresa Marie Schiavo
Mr. Speaker, 2,000 years ago Jesus Christ entered Jerusalem on Palm Sunday, marking the beginning of a week that throughout history and the world over has signified the sanctity of human life. Tonight we are here on Palm Sunday to afford…
Mr. Speaker, 2,000 years ago Jesus Christ entered Jerusalem on Palm Sunday, marking the beginning of a week that throughout history and the world over has signified the sanctity of human life. Tonight we are here on Palm Sunday to afford the greatest presumption of life possible under our United States Constitution to a woman who has never truly been afforded representation and whose wishes are truly unknown.
This is not about the sanctity of the Schiavo marriage. That is a matter between Terri and Michael. Mr. Schiavo has got some answering to do himself. Any insinuation otherwise is clear hypocrisy and nothing more. And this is not about congressional interference into a family issue. I agree that it should be a family issue.
The problem is Terri's parents want her to live, and Terri's husband wants her to die. And Terri did not use a living will to tell us what she would want. So before an irreversible decision is made, her country must afford her the due process to which she is entitled under the 14th amendment of our Constitution. That means that the State of Florida may not starve Terri to death unless every legal resource to prevent it has been taken. Death by starvation, as we have already heard tonight, is lengthy and incredibly painful. And Terri Schiavo can feel pain. The bill that we are going to pass is going to give her due process before she is sentenced to die in this painful manner.
Convicted serial killers and other death row inmates are afforded Federal review in their cases. The Constitution confers upon this Congress the power to effect the authority on the Federal courts to conduct this kind of review, and that is what I hope we do here tonight. It is square within our powers, it respects the separation between the legislative and the judicial branches, and it holds to the principles of federalism.
There is going to be hollow rhetoric in this Chamber tonight about the need for investigations and about reviewing facts before acting and about attempts to politicize religious beliefs. But where were these arguments last Wednesday night when we passed a bill for Terri unanimously under voice vote? And where were these arguments Friday afternoon when Judge Greer ignored a congressional subpoena designed to allow us the chance to get more information?
The Supreme Court has stated that the authority to subpoena is an ``indispensable ingredient'' of Congress' legislative power. Judge Greer's Friday order expressly disregards that authority, and he should be held in contempt of this body. Like Michael Schiavo, the Judge has some answering to do.
We have a woman who hasn't had food or drink in over two days. We made efforts in the ordinary course of legislative business to afford Terri Schiavo her constitutional rights, and they were rejected. Now, we are left with no choice but to implement extraordinary means in the middle of the night.
Whether you're using morality, or religion, or the Golden Rule, or legal analysis to guide your decision, at the root of all this is a living, breathing American citizen who has been deprived of her rights. This measure will correct that, so I urge all my colleagues to support it.