Mr. Speaker, by direction of the Committee on Rules, I call up House Resolution 422 and ask for its immediate consideration. Mr. Speaker, for the purpose of debate only, I yield the customary 30 minutes to the gentleman from Massachusetts…
Mr. Speaker, by direction of the Committee on Rules, I call up House Resolution 422 and ask for its immediate consideration.
Mr. Speaker, for the purpose of debate only, I yield the customary 30 minutes to the gentleman from Massachusetts (Mr. McGovern), pending which I yield myself such time as I may consume. During consideration of this resolution, all time yielded is for the purpose of debate only.
(Mr. LINCOLN DIAZ-BALART of Florida asked and was given permission to revise and extend his remarks.)
Mr. Speaker, House Resolution 422 is a rule providing for consideration of the conference report accompanying H.R. 2115, the Vision 100--Century of Aviation Reauthorization Act.
Mr. Speaker, I would briefly remind this Congress of the essential authorizations provided through this bill. First and foremost, the legislation reauthorizes the FAA for 4 years and $3.4 billion in fiscal 2004, increasing by $100 million each year thereafter. The FAA is, of course, primarily responsible for the safety of the Nation's skies through activities ranging from the continued monitoring by air traffic controllers to the development of new airspace technologies.
The district that I am honored to represent contains Miami International Airport, consistently one of
the Nation's busiest, both for international and domestic travel. I am always impressed by the level of public-private cooperation between such organizations as the FAA and Miami International. This cooperation is evident, as well, through many provisions in this legislation, for example, $500 million for airport security improvements at airports; grants and tax credits for low emissions; compensation to general aviation for losses from security mandates; and war risk insurance to the airlines through March 30, 2008.
This Congress was quick to assist airlines after the tragedy of 9-11, and rightfully so. The economic benefits from the movement of people and goods the airlines provide obviously demanded our attention. However, we must also consider those smaller aircraft which were restricted for months. Accordingly, this Congress will act through the underlying legislation to help general aviation return to financial stability by providing compensation for the hardships on their business. This bill authorizes $100 million for these general aviators that were greatly affected by increased security restrictions.
I would like to thank the gentleman from Alaska (Chairman Young) and the gentleman from Florida (Chairman Mica) for their extraordinary leadership on this important reauthorization, and I urge my colleagues to support this important rule and the underlying legislation.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
I certainly have not seen it all, but I am learning a lot this morning, hearing the debate. Approximately 150 towers were privatized during the Clinton years. This legislation does not mandate any privatization of towers, and yet trying to reconcile with this reality and these facts, what I am hearing.
Mr. Speaker, at this time, in order to elicit some information and some facts about what the legislation is doing, I yield such time as he may consume to the gentleman from Alaska (Mr. Young), the chairman of the Committee on Transportation.
(Mr. YOUNG of Alaska asked and was given permission to revise and extend his remarks.)
Mr. Speaker, I yield such time as he may consume to the distinguished gentleman from Florida (Mr. Mica), chairman of the Subcommittee on Aviation.
(Mr. MICA asked and was given permission to revise and extend his remarks, and include extraneous material.)
Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the distinguished gentleman from Georgia (Mr. Isakson).
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
I sympathize with my good friends on the other side of the aisle. When I arrived in this Congress along with the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Mica) 11 years ago, I was in the minority, and I remember what it was not to have the votes, the majority of the votes to get one's ideas passed and to come into law. So I sympathize when now our colleagues on the other side of the aisle do not have the majority of the votes, how they must feel, but I think it is important that some facts now be put on the record, Mr. Speaker.
This legislation before us mandates no privatization of towers. During the years of the Clinton Presidency, approximately 150 such towers were privatized. I do not recall my friends protesting, but this legislation, which obviously they are complaining about today, mandates no such privatization of towers, like we had 150 during the Clinton years.
Despite the fact that we on this side of the aisle have the majority of the votes, it is important to point out that in the writing of the bill and the original conference report, our friends on the other side of the aisle were intimately involved. Many provisions, in fact, were included in the bill at the request of our friends on the other side of the aisle.
For example, a special rule to maintain the minimum AIP entitlement at small airports that have lost passengers, I am told the gentleman from Massachusetts (Mr. McGovern) came forth with that idea.
A sense of Congress on 5th freedom and 7th freedom flights, I believe the distinguished gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Lipinski) brought forth that idea.
An increase in the MPO participation in the airport planning process, I believe the gentleman from Oregon (Mr. Blumenauer) had that idea.
Requirement to provide additional information to families affected by aircraft accidents, I believe the gentleman from New York (Mr. Weiner) had that idea.
Restriction on flights at Teterboro airport, I believe the gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Rothman) had that idea.
Flight attendant certification, deadline for issuance of Stage 4 noise reduction rule, curriculum standards for maintenance technicians, provision on foreign repair station security, all of these ideas came from our friends on the other side of the aisle.
So it is important for the facts to be known. There is frustration in being in the minority. I remember my first term here, but let us not negate the facts that in the fairness of the majority, many ideas of the minority were included. So I think that is required. I think that is required by democracy, respect for the minority, and we see in this legislation the fruits of much respect for the minority, but in addition to ideas that were brought forth by the minority, there are many ideas brought forth, I would say many more, by the majority that are very important to the safety of aviation in this country, Mr. Speaker, and that is why we must pass this legislation today.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I might consume.
Just to reiterate, we reiterate some facts that I attempted to bring out before. First of all, with regard to the towers privatized, airports privatized, during the Clinton administration, about 100 of them were former FAA staffed towers. I reiterate again, that in the legislation brought forth today, there is mandated no privatization of towers.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 4 minutes to the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Mica), the distinguished chairman of the Subcommittee on Aviation.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.