Floor Statements

Mr. Speaker, I rise today to pay tribute to Army Sergeant Michael Egan, who made the ultimate sacrifice in the service of his country on September 19, 2005 at the age of 36. While on patrol near Ramadi, Sergeant Egan's convoy came under ambush

when an improvised explosive device exploded near his vehicle, claiming the lives of Egan and three comrades.

Following a distinguished career with the United States Marine Corps, including service in Operation Desert Storm, Michael Egan retired and returned to civilian life in 1999. He accepted a job with Reliance Electric in the Philadelphia area, where he was known for his tireless work ethic, eagerness to learn, and outgoing personality. In 2003, Michael made the decision to once again serve his country, joining the United States Army as a member of the Pennsylvania National Guard.

Michael leaves behind a loving wife, Maria, and a three-year-old daughter, Samantha. A dedicated family man, he recently relocated his family to Delaware in the interests of his daughter's education.

In closing Mr. Speaker, Michael Egan will be deeply missed by all who knew him. For Michael's heroic service and valiant sacrifice, our country will forever be indebted to him and his family. I join the countless voices in thanking him for his selfless contributions to our Nation.

Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman for yielding me this time, and I rise to say a couple of things. I will speak more when the bill is on the floor.

Mr. Speaker, we worked very hard to make this a piece of legislation that could be supported by all of us, and I think we succeeded on that, as was shown by the unanimous vote coming out of the Committee on Education and the Workforce.

There are a lot of issues. It is not quite as easy as it sounds. I thank the staff on both sides who had a great deal to do with that.

I also would like to say that I think the Committee on Rules has been extremely fair. I would hope that this is a rule that all Members could support. We may disagree, and in fact I disagree with a couple of the amendments, but I agree with most of them on both sides. I think there are some very good, positive suggestions, and I know sometimes we complain about closed rules, whatever, but this is certainly a rule that is not closed, that is going to allow a lot of opportunity for debate.

I have listened to part of the debate here on the faith-based that is going to go on all day, I suppose. There is disagreement with respect to that, which is unfortunate because it detracts from what is a piece of legislation that otherwise we could all support. But on the other hand, there are strong views on that and I think they have a right to be recognized, and a vote needs to be taken on that, too.

I would like to say that things have changed a great deal with how we look at Head Start. In fact, in some ways it was a poverty program when it began. It was basically a social service program to a great degree. We are now diverting it to more of an academic program. There is no question about that, and I think that is good. We need to get all of these kids up to the starting line, equal. That is what it is all about. If a child is 3 or 4, we need to give them that opportunity.

I think this legislation does that. I think we are all in that together. I think everybody in this building would agree that we need to do that. So I hope we keep that in mind as we look at our amendments and the legislation, and hopefully when the day is over we can move forward in helping these young people.

Mr. Chairman, I thank the chairman for yielding me time, and I also thank him for his tremendous work in bringing this bill together. It is not always that easy. He has done a superb job working with the other side.

I do rise today to ask everybody here to support the legislation which will reauthorize the Head Start program. I, like I think most of us, if not all of us, believe very strongly in the Head Start program, and I believe that this act emphasizes every child, regardless of his or her economic status, should have the best chance possible to succeed.

In 1965, Head Start was created to give economically disadvantaged children access to the same educational, health, nutritional, social, and other services that were enjoyed by their more affluent peers. The goal of the program was, as it remains today, to provide children a solid foundation that will prepare them for success in school and later in life.

As the centerpiece of the Federal Government's efforts to support quality early childhood education for our Nation's most disadvantaged youth, Head Start has served nearly 20 million low-income children and their families. Currently, Head Start serves over 900,000 children every day and has nearly 1,600 grantees across the United States. In my home State of Delaware, Head Start programs serve over 1,500 children, with almost 500 additional 4-year-olds receiving assistance through State government funding.

We all can agree on the need for Head Start and its successes. We must also recognize Head Start can produce even greater results for children. Children who attend Head Start programs start school more prepared than those with similar backgrounds that do not attend Head Start. However, Head Start students continue to enter kindergarten well below national norms in school readiness. By moving to close the school readiness gap, this bill will improve results for almost 1 million Head Start students across the Nation.

Towards the goal of closing the readiness gap, the School Readiness Act strengthens Head Start's academic focus while maintaining its comprehensive nature that is imperative to its success. The bill improves the academic focus of the program by establishing new quality standards that ensure enrolled children develop and demonstrate language skills; pre-reading knowledge; including an interest in and appreciation of books; reading and writing; pre-math knowledge such as recognition of numbers and counting; cognitive abilities related to academic achievement; and social development important for environments constructive for child development, early learning, and school success.

Research clearly and consistently demonstrates a link between the learning potential of children and the level of education and training of classroom teachers. For that reason, we improve the quality of teachers in Head Start classrooms by requiring that, in time, 50 percent of all Head Start teachers nationwide must have a baccalaureate degree.

I am sure some of my colleagues were pleased to learn that this bill does not include a block grant or a State demonstration project. I believe strongly, however, in the policy goals of coordination and integration that were at the heart of the demonstration project incorporated in the legislation I introduced last Congress. We continue to believe it is essential to remove barriers and prevent collaboration between Head Start and successful State and local early childhood initiatives, and I believe the proposal we are offering will, in fact, go further to foster integration among quality early childhood programs.

About 40 States, including Delaware, have established some form of early childhood education, because States recognize that these services can make a real difference in preparing children for a successful future. Various local initiatives have been launched, and today, disadvantaged children and families have access to programs and services from a wide range of sources. Some of these programs rival or exceed the quality of Head Start, while others fall short. Head Start is no longer the only option for early childhood education. We must ensure that all children are receiving the same quality education. In this new era, Head Start should be working towards integrating services with other school readiness programs, not competing against them.

Where we previously would have allowed no more than eight States to improve Head Start coordination with State and local efforts, this bill will ensure programs in all 50 States are able to increase collaboration. We are encouraging Head Start grantees to align their academics with State-developed K-through-12 content standards, as well as to have a more active partnership with local school districts that serve the same communities. This will help to facilitate a smooth transition to kindergarten for their students. Finally, we are asking early childhood providers in a State, including Head Start, preschool and child care, to come together to identify ways to integrate school readiness initiatives across the State.

As I have said, I believe in the program, particularly because of how the program helps children later in their academic lives. Despite these stories, we have also heard many stories of programs in which funds were being diverted away from this purpose. The GAO recently released a report that warned the financial control system in the Federal Head Start early childhood program is flawed and failing to prevent multimillion-dollar financial abuses that cheat poor children, taxpayers, and law-abiding Head Start operators.

The GAO made a couple of recommendations on how we can strengthen the oversight structure to prevent abuses and protect good grantees. It recommended that increased competition in the program could help weed out poorly performing grantees and ensure high-quality services are available to children and families. In response to the GAO's recommendations, we are increasing the competitive nature of current program. The competition requirements in the School Readiness Act will help to alleviate these programs, but more importantly, will drive program improvement across the board, program improvements that will ultimately help thousands of children nationwide, which should always be our goal.

This is an important and a very popular program. The importance of early childhood education services cannot be overstated, and I believe strongly in the reforms which are here.

I would say finally, although we may have some disagreement about some of the amendments on this legislation, that ultimately getting all these children up to the starting line equal in school, and particularly those who are at 100 percent of poverty or less, is in the best interests of all of us in Congress and all the kids out there in the United States of America.

I hope we can go forward with good legislation to make a very good program even better than it is.

Mr. Chairman, I offer an amendment.

Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I may consume.

I am pleased to offer this amendment which I indicated was drafted on a bipartisan basis. Specifically, the amendment would revise the financial audit language to ensure that financial audit requirements for Head Start programs are consistent with those required under the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1986; that it builds on parental consent requirements included in H.R. 2123 as reported, to further clarify that any health service available to children in Head Start may not be performed without the prior written consent of the parent; and included a number of technical and conforming amendments.

To the best of our knowledge, there is no dispute about this, and the details of it can be discussed at further length if anybody wants.

Mr. Chairman, I reserve the balance of my time.

Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my time.

Mr. Chairman, I totally oppose this amendment, and I oppose the statements which have been made here that it takes away from the parents, the rights they may have. Basically, what our bill does is reinstate the parents council where it was always supposed to be.

Dr. Edward Zigler, who is opposed, by the way, to some things that I was for in the past, so I do not always quote him, but he is widely credited as the Father of Head Start, and many people follow him here, and he stated with respect to the policy council: ``I created and implemented the policy councils in the early 1970s. The time was past due to take a fresh look at the government issue. In fact, I very much like that the House bill keeps in place the policy council with the role I had in mind for it, while putting above it a board of directors with what I see to be some good requirements for membership on this board. I like the synergism that you have built between the board and the policy council,'' said Zigler's letter.

I think this is the right governance for our Head Start operations in the United States of America. I would encourage everyone here to listen carefully, as it is very easy to say, oh, give the authority to the parents. The bottom line is they will be involved and engaged, but the board will make the decisions. That is the way it should be. I urge the defeat of this amendment.

Mr. Chairman, I do not oppose the amendment, but I ask unanimous consent to claim the time in opposition.

Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I may consume.

Mr. Chairman, I would like to say how strongly I personally, and I hope all of us would support the Stearns amendment. I think it makes a tremendous amount of sense.

This amendment, the one before it, and a couple of others we have I think actually truly improve the bill. They are not just amendments we are accepting, but they are amendments which indeed make the bill better.

The gentleman from Florida (Mr. Stearns) has pointed out, in my judgment, a significant problem in education. I think it is greater as you deal with lower-income children, to even a greater extent than perhaps it is with other children, and as a result of that, I think such training is absolutely in order.

So I would like to thank the gentleman for that and I would like to congratulate him for thinking of the idea. Certainly I am in support of the amendment.

Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my time.

Mr. Chairman, I do not oppose the amendment, but I ask unanimous consent to claim the time in opposition.

Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I may consume.

Mr. Chairman, I do rise in support of the Davis amendment. I believe this is one that improves our legislation.

The amendment supports outreach efforts to train and recruit African American and Latino American men to become Head Start teachers. Any such teachers would still be required to meet teacher qualification requirements, of course, which are in the School Readiness Act.

The amendment would help to ensure African American and Latino American men are encouraged to become teachers, Head Start teachers. I think that is a goal that is very laudable, teachers in general, as a matter of fact.

This amendment supports these men to provide quality services and instruction to the many children with diverse backgrounds and participate in the Head Start program. That is absolutely true. That there are many people with diverse backgrounds in the Head Start program. It is important to understand this amendment does not create a new program. Instead, it directs the Secretary of HHS to support outreach to minorities. That is only correct and right, and for that reason I hope we would all support the Davis amendment.

Mr. Chairman, I reserve the balance of my time.

Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my time.

Mr. Chairman, I do not oppose the amendment, but I ask unanimous consent to claim the time in opposition.

Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I may consume.

First, let me just say that I strongly support the Filner amendment. Actually, it is interesting to hear some of these amendments, because they would apply to education in general and not just to Head Start, and I think this is one that falls into that category.

It is very important to understand qualifications, retention, and what is happening in that particular area. I think, as I know the gentleman from California (Mr. Filner) is aware, but I think everybody needs to be aware of the fact that the underlying bill requires that at least 50 percent of all Head Start teachers nationwide have a baccalaureate or advanced degree in early childhood education or related field by September 30, 2011. And it also requires that within 3 years all Head Start teachers hired after the date of enactment of this act must have at least an associate degree in early childhood education or related field, or be enrolled in a program of study leading to an associate degree in early childhood education or related field within 3 years.

These are significant steps. They will enhance the educational progress as far as Head Start is concerned. We also need to worry about the retention. It is going to raise economic issues in terms of being able to pay for this. We are clearly going to have to look at that in terms of our future appropriations. So I think all this melds together in what in my mind would be a dramatic improvement in Head Start.

Again, we retain all of the services presently provided. It is just that there is an added emphasis on the educational side of it, which I think we all agree is needed. So I am strongly in support of the amendment.

Mr. Chairman, I reserve the balance of my time.

Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my time.

Mr. Chairman, I do not oppose the amendment, but I ask unanimous consent to claim the time in opposition.

Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I may consume, and I rise in very strong support of this amendment, which goes along with a number of other amendments which we have had, which is recognizing the fact that when you are dealing with Head Start you are dealing with a population that comes from 100 percent of poverty or less, and you are dealing with people who are going to have barriers in terms of their education. They may be barriers in terms of where they live or the ability of the parents to care for them. They may be homeless or foster children, as the sponsor has pointed out; and I think it is only right and just and absolutely the correct thing to do to increase that access.

In fact, perhaps that is more important than anything else we can do in terms of the kinds of children we are reaching out to, in terms of their background issues. So for that reason, I am extremely supportive of this amendment, and I think it is a great deal of help to what I believe is already a good piece of legislation, and I encourage each and every one of us to support it.

Mr. Chairman, I reserve the balance of my time.

Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my time.

Madam Chairman, I rise today to strongly support swift passage of this legislation. I thank Representative Ehlers and Chairman Boehlert for their work on this important measure. I would like to highlight the success of The Delaware Manufacturing Extension Partnership, DEMEP, in its contributions to manufacturing across the First State.

The Federal funding Delaware MEP receives through the national MEP program has helped them to develop the resources necessary to contribute to the success of Delaware's small and medium-sized manufacturers in improving their global competitiveness. By identifying, transferring, and implementing appropriate best practices, Delaware MEP has helped manufacturers to substantially improve their quality, productivity, and profitability.

The manufacturing sector in Delaware is dealing with the same burdens that are affecting all U.S. manufacturers--rising costs of labor, health care, energy, and regulatory compliance. The Delaware MEP exists to strengthen local manufacturers by assisting them in dealing with these important issues. Of the 60 MEP centers in the U.S. and Puerto Rico, the Delaware MEP ranks No. 1 in impact to Client's bottom line dollars generated per Federal dollar invested, meaning $65.08 for every $1 invested in 2004; and they rank No. 2 in customer satisfaction. Additionally, the Delaware MEP helped retain or create 1,020 jobs in Delaware in 2003.

The Delaware MEP offers Delaware manufacturers a variety of public seminars and workshops, as well as confidential management assistance to help companies improve their competitiveness. Programs include: the Lean Enterprises program to support growth by enhancing work processes; the Quality Management program that ensures consistent product quality and minimizes waste; and the Driving Revenue Growth program to increase sales using marketing strategies. Programs such as these have helped Delaware companies record significant improvements in productivity and profitability while decreasing waste.

In its 11th year of service, Delaware MEP has successfully strengthened competitiveness, improved productivity, and increased profits for Delaware manufacturers by guiding them in the implementation of best practices.

The Delaware MEP will continue to work with its many local, regional, and national partners--including the United States Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST, the Delaware Office of Economic Development, DEDO, Delaware Technical and Community College, and the Delaware State and local Chambers of Commerce--to bring innovative programs to Delaware manufacturers to serve their competitive needs and to help them compete and prosper.

Madam Chairman, these programs will continue to support manufacturing in Delaware and in the United States, contributing greatly to job creation and a stronger economy. I urge my colleagues to support this legislation.

Mr. Speaker, it is with great pleasure that I rise today to pay tribute to Joyce Figgs, the outgoing President of the Ladies Auxiliary of the Delaware Volunteer Firemen's Association (LADVFA). In addition to logging more than 46 years of service to the Delmar Ladies Auxiliary, Joyce has also served several terms as President of the Delmar chapter.

From 1991-1993, Joyce served as the Ladies Auxiliary President in Wicomico County, Maryland. After a successful term in the Free State, thankfully, Joyce shifted her talents to Delaware and in 1993, was elected President of the Sussex County Ladies Auxiliary.

In 1994, Joyce was inducted into the Del-Mar-Va Hall of Honor, an illustrious and fitting tribute. However, her service would not stop with this induction. Joyce would serve additional terms as President of the Del-Mar-Va Firemen's Association Ladies Auxiliary from 1996 to 1997 and President in Wicomico County until 2003.

As you know, firefighters are of critical importance to our society. In order to be as effective as possible, they require dedicated and organized supporters. During her tenure, Joyce has led the Auxiliary in these areas admirably.

In closing Mr. Speaker, I would like to recognize Joyce Figgs for her exceptional career of service and dedication. LADVFA 1st Vice-President Barbara Rossiter and 2nd Vice-President Florence Legates join me in congratulating Joyce on her service as President of the LADVFA.

Mr. Speaker, it is with great pleasure that I rise today to pay tribute to Ray Stevens, the outgoing President of the Delaware Volunteer Firemen's Association (DVFA). During his tenure, Ray has served with distinction in a variety of positions within Delaware's Fire Service.

Originally joining the Selbyville, Delaware Volunteer Fire Company in July of 1967, Ray remains an active member to this day. From 1968 through 1971, Ray served as the 1st and

2nd Assistant Chief of the Selbyville Delaware Volunteer Fire Company. In 1972, he served as the Chief of the Selbyville Fire Company, a post he would hold again from 1996-1997.

In his 38 years, Ray has served the Selbyville Fire Company in a variety of other positions, including work as Assistant Treasurer, a 32-year stint as an Engineer, and his current work as both a human resources officer and a safety officer. After serving as President of the Selbyville Fire Company, Ray moved to the Sussex County Volunteer Firemen's Association, where he would serve as President from 1999- 2000.

As you know, firefighters are of critical importance to our society. In order to be as effective as possible, they require dedicated and organized supporters. Over the past year, Ray has exemplified these qualities and effectively led the DVFA. For his hard work, both the State of Delaware and the United States of America are indebted to him.

Mr. Speaker, in closing, I would like to congratulate Mr. Stevens on his exceptional career of service and dedication. DVFA 1st Vice- President and incoming President Ken Pyle and 2nd Vice-President Alan Robinson join me in congratulating Ray on his service as President of the DVFA.

Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of H.R. 3645 to provide emergency supplemental appropriations to meet the immediate needs arising from the consequences of Hurricane Katrina. But more importantly, I rise today in support of the hundreds of thousands of men, women and children who are suffering throughout the Gulf Coast States as a result of what has been called our Nation's greatest natural disaster, Hurricane Katrina. I know I speak for all of my colleagues when I say our prayers are with each and everyone of them as they struggle through these extremely difficult and life threatening times.

The supplemental legislation we are approving today is absolutely critical to continue the infusion of federal funding into this area. News agencies have reported the cost of this disaster to be around $500 million a day. The $10.5 billion in federal funding we are approving today should be viewed as a down payment in terms of funding and resources to come in the following months. I am confident these resources will be used efficiently and effectively, helping those most in need and importantly, helping to support emergency protective measures as well as debris removal and rehabilitation.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency should be recognized for its response to this disaster and their organization of food, water, medical supplies, generators, shelter and other items to help those who have been displaced due to Hurricane Katrina. And the Department of Defense and National Guard should be recognized for the deployment of military personnel who are helping communities respond to this crisis.

I know personally that every State is pooling their resources and is doing all it can to help these victims in the Gulf Coast area. For example in my home State of Delaware, we have deployed National Guard troops and planes to help at Ground Zero and in the surrounding disaster areas; Delaware State University is waiving tuition for Tulane University students to attend class; my office is working with the Food Bank of Delaware to start a Hunger Drive for those in need; local schools are collecting monetary donations to send to the victims; and, Delmarva Power is sending workers to restore electricity in the region. But I am confident we can reach even deeper and partner together to help our fellow Americans.

It is always in times of tragedy--like the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 or the Tsunami this past December in Southeast Asia--where human decency and patriotism is front and center. We need to muster the same resources and patriotism and provide the same help to the victims of Hurricane Katrina.

I am hopeful the Federal Government will continue to respond in a way that is appropriate, action oriented and immediate to the Gulf Coast Region. As I have said, the funding we are approving today, is just the beginning. I expect a more comprehensive package to reach the House Floor in the coming weeks, once more precise estimates are understood.

These are very sad and trying times. May God Bless those in need and their families.

Mr. Speaker, it is with great respect, admiration and much sorrow that I rise today to remember the life of Rosalie S. Obara. Rosalie was elected to the office of New Castle County Clerk of the Peace for a record seven terms, serving from 1969 to 1996. She loved life and took great pleasure in giving back to the community that brought her so much happiness. She was also indispensable to my own career, lending a helping hand in many elections.

In the 1930's, Rosalie moved to Delaware, where she would raise four kids with her husband Frank J. Obara, a former City Council President. During her seven terms as Clerk of the Peace, she would perform over 15,400 marriages.

In addition to her professional success, Rosalie left an indelible mark on her community. She was the co-founder and one-time president of the Americans of Polish Descent Cultural Society, as well as an officer with the Council of Polish Societies and Clubs of Delaware. Rosalie was also very active in her church, St. Hedwig, and served the Republican Party as a member of the State Committee and the New Castle County Republican Women's Club.

During her lifetime, Rosalie was the recipient of numerous honors, including the Order of the First State, the highest honor given by the State of Delaware. During the Eisenhower administration, she joined Mamie Eisenhower for tea in the White House. Rosalie will be remembered for her class and dignity.

In closing Mr. Speaker, I would like to point to a 1996 quote from Rosalie that sums up her American Dream story, ``I'm the daughter of immigrants. I survived the Depression. I had a limited education, but I made something of myself . . . I am glad I was able to help others.'' Rosalie Obara can rest in peace knowing that she was always able to help others with grace and elegance.

Mr. Speaker, it is with a heavy heart that I rise today to remember the life of Mary M. Boggs of Seaford, Delaware. Born 82 years ago to loving parents Linden E. Boggs, Sr., and Addie Phillips Marvel, Mary would go on to have a tremendous influence on not only the Seaford community, but also all of Delaware.

Upon graduation from Beacom Business College, Mary would embark on a distinguished career as the administrative service officer for the Department of Justice. After retiring, Mary would continue her service to the community with the Board of Directors for the Seaford Historical Society and as a member of the Acorn Club and VFW Post #4961 Auxiliary.

While very active in the community, Mary's impact was felt most by the local, county, and State branches of the Republican Party. The consummate volunteer, Mary was always willing to help and expected nothing more than a ``thank you'' in return. Her involvement with the party began in 1944 and she would eventually serve as the president of the Seaford Republican Women's Club and the Delaware Federation of Republican Women. Additionally, Mary was a devoted member of the Senior Citizen's Task Force for the National Federation of Republican Women.

On a personal note, Mary was instrumental in helping me throughout my political career, including my campaigns for Lieutenant Governor, Governor, and the United States House of Representatives. Many of us counted on Mary, and I can truly say she never let us down.

Mr. Speaker, in closing, all who knew Mary were lucky to have been graced by her presence. While I know she will be greatly missed by her family and friends, Mary Boggs will always be remembered for the work she has done throughout the State of Delaware and for the Republican Party.

Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 3, the House- Senate agreement on the ``Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users.'' This legislation has been a long time in the making, and I applaud the conference committee for their commitment to finding a compromise that will enhance our transportation system and make our roads safer for all Americans.

Since the last highway bill expired in October 2003, this Congress has struggled to produce effective reauthorization legislation. Along the way, I have expressed a great deal of concern with specific aspects of this process. In fact, I voted against this bill in April 2004, and again this past March, due to my concern over proposed changes to the formula Congress uses to provide transportation funds to States. Under these changes, large States like Texas and Florida would have seen their funding for highway construction and transit projects increased, at the expense of small States like Delaware.

While it is important to ensure that all States receive an adequate rate-of-return from the Highway Trust Fund, the provisions in the House version of the highway bill would have diverted funds away from aging infrastructure and heavily congested roads in the northeast. I am pleased to see that the final conference report eliminates these detrimental provisions and settles on a compromise that guarantees an increased funding authorization for all States. Under this agreement, Delaware's highly stressed transportation system is expected to see a 30 percent increase in highway funds over the next few years.

I am also very pleased to see that the conference committee has included safety standards to protect against vehicle rollover, side impact crashes, roof crush, and occupant ejection--all of which were left out of the House-passed bill. There were 42,800 highway deaths in 2004, with the largest increase in fatalities occurring in rollover crashes. In early July, I joined several of my House colleagues in requesting that conferees included this language and I believe it will do a great deal to enhance safety requirements for automobiles over the next five years.

In addition, the conference report takes steps to improve the bill's environmental regulations, which have been of some concern to me throughout this debate.

Despite these and other encouraging advancements, I remain concerned over the conference report's bulky price tag and excessive number of Member earmarks. This bill is by no means perfect, however it succeeds in finding a degree of balance and providing funding for essential programs across the Nation.

In Delaware, this funding cannot come soon enough. Our State is at the nexus of travel on the northeast corridor and our roads and bridges are suffering from increased traffic and highway congestion. H.R. 3 will provide the foundation for tremendous improvements in Delaware and it authorizes funding for much needed projects such as the Indian River Inlet Bridge and the hectic I-95/SR-1 interchange in New Castle County.

In 2003, we started out with an impractical proposal and a guaranteed veto threat from the President. Today, we have an agreement that is reasonable and will create jobs, boost our economy, and provide indispensable infrastructure improvements in places like Delaware. This bill has come a long way, and I commend the conferees for their dedication to finding an agreement that is both fair and effective.

Mr. Speaker, I rise today to pay tribute to a Delawarean of great character, courage, and patriotism, who passed away on July 4, 2005 at the age of 71. Major General Richard A. Freytag, USAF (Ret.), was born on October 26, 1933, marking the beginning of a lifetime of distinguished service to his family, community, and country.

General Freytag's 38 years of service with the United States Air Force began with his commission as a 2nd Lieutenant in 1956. Although he completed active duty in 1959, General Freytag's strong sense of duty compelled him to continue as an Air Force Reserve officer throughout his civilian career, holding positions at the Pentagon and the National Defense University in Washington. In 2000, already a decorated veteran, General Freytag was awarded the Medal for Distinguished Public Service, the highest tribute awarded to a civilian by the Department of Defense.

In his civilian life, General Freytag understood the importance of education, working tirelessly to earn graduate degrees from both Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. This ambition fueled a successful career with Citicorp Inc., eventually bringing General Freytag to New Castle, Delaware in 1984 to become President and C.E.O. of the Citicorp Banking Corporation.

Despite his substantial time commitments, General Freytag was an active member in his local community. For decades, he was involved with numerous Air Force charities. Following his retirement from Citicorp in 1996, he volunteered with several organizations in Delaware, including the Delaware Bankers Association and the Medical Center of Delaware. A devoted family man; he is survived by his wife Pamela, children Richard and Bliss, and grandchildren Henley and Coryell.

Mr. Speaker, in closing, I would like to remember General Freytag as a man of character, courage, and compassion, who I was proud to call my friend. I join with my colleagues in celebrating the life lived by this great American, and offer my sincerest sympathy to his family and friends throughout Delaware and the United States.

Mr. Speaker, I rise to pay tribute to a heroic Delaware firefighter, Joseph Evans, who tragically died in the line of duty at the age of 61. While responding to a house fire in the early hours of July 10th, 2005, Joe, an engineer with the Bridgeville Volunteer Fire Company, suffered a heart attack. Despite the best efforts of medical personnel, Joseph Evans passed away shortly after his arrival at the Nanticoke Hospital.

For 41 years, Joseph Evans was a member of the Bridgeville Volunteer Fire Company. During his dedicated career with Station #72, Joe served in many capacities, including Director of Supplies, Assistant Chief Engineer, and Chief Engineer. In 1968, his work earned him recognition as Bridgeville's ``Fireman of the Year.'' Joe's efforts were not confined to Bridgeville; he also served with the Sussex County Firemen's Association, the Sussex County Fire Chiefs Association, the Delaware State Fire Chiefs Association and the Del-Mar- Va Volunteer Firemen's Association.

In addition to his work with the fire department, Joe was successful in other pursuits. As a young man, he distinguished himself athletically as a member of the 1962 Blue-Gold All Star Football team. A lifetime farmer, Joe also worked as a telephone lineman for Diamond State and later Bell Atlantic, where he received the company's Spirit of Excellence Award.

Mr. Speaker, in closing, Joseph Evans heroically gave his life in the service of others. This dedication, which is typical of firemen throughout the United States, is a testament to his courage and selflessness. I join my colleagues in remembering Joe's contributions

and offer my sincerest sympathy to both his family and his colleagues at the Bridgeville Volunteer Fire Company.

Mr. Chairman, I rise in support of the amendment to restore funding for Amtrak. I appreciate the gentleman from Ohio's work on this effort, and I thank the gentleman from Michigan (Mr. Knollenberg), the subcommittee chairman for his willingness to work with Members on this extremely important issue.

While I agree that reform is necessary, the administration's goal of ending Federal support for passenger rail is at best half-baked. Unlike aviation highways and transit, there is no dedicated fund for investing in passenger rail development. Although these other modes rely on user fees for a great deal of their funding, they still receive a large amount from the General Fund. In addition, these other modes all operate on predominantly Federally owned or Federally assisted infrastructure and rely largely on government supported security, research and traffic controllers.

Despite the fact that passenger rail has proven to be such an easy security target in other parts of the world, the TSA's fiscal year 2005 appropriation included only about $12 million for passenger rail, compared to the $4.32 billion that was allocated for aviation security, close to half of which comes from the General Fund, not aviation security user fees.

While the TSA is currently spending $16 million a year on new uniforms for airport screeners, passenger rail relies on a total force of 342 Amtrak officers to protect 25 million yearly passengers traveling on 22,000 miles of track in 46 States. When you consider the fact that 20 percent of all Americans live in the northeast, and approximately 1,700 commuter trains travel the northeast corridor every day, we need to seriously consider the amount of congestion and overcrowding that would occur if these trains stopped running.

Passenger rail can be extremely effective in relieving congestion, cutting pollution and lowering our demand for oil while creating jobs and increasing security. We have barely scratched the surface of passenger rail's potential, and a commitment from Congress to improving the viability of this system would lead to greatly expanded possibilities.

The facts are clear. Amtrak needs Federal support to survive just like highways, ports and airlines. America is a world leader in all other modes of transportation. When it comes to rail, we are quickly falling behind.

Mr. Chairman, many Americans depend on Amtrak for both business and pleasure. Instead of bankrupting the organization, we should work together to improve passenger rail. Pass this amendment.

Mr. Chairman, I rise in support of the amendment to restore funding for Amtrak. I appreciate Mr. LaTourette's work on this effort and I thank the Subcommittee Chairman for his willingness to work with Members on this extremely important matter.

The $550 million provided by the subcommittee is $650 million less than the funds appropriated for passenger rail in FY05. Based on the bill's instructions, Amtrak may use the funds to operate the North-East Corridor and short-distance trains, but will be prohibited from using funds to operate its 15 long-distance trains and 3 shorter distance routes. However, when you take into account Amtrak's considerable mandatory debt payments and the severance expenses that would result from shutting down these routes, there is a significant question as to whether anything would be left for operating expenses in the North- East.

While I strongly agree that reform is necessary, the Administration's goal of ending Federal support for passenger rail is at best half- baked. Unlike aviation, highways, and transit, there is no dedicated fund for investing in passenger rail development. Although these other modes rely on user fees for a great deal of their funding, they still receive a large amount from the general fund. In addition, these other modes all operate on predominantly federally owned or federally assisted infrastructure, and rely largely on government-supported security, research, and traffic controllers.

Despite the fact that passenger rail has proven to be such an easy target in other parts of the world, the TSA's fiscal year 2005 appropriation of $5.15 billion included only about $12 million for passenger rail--compared to the $4.32 billion that was allocated for aviation security, roughly half of which comes out of the general fund--not aviation security user fees. While the TSA is currently spending $16 million a year on new uniforms for airport screeners, passenger rail relies on a total force of 342 Amtrak officers to protect 25 million yearly passengers traveling on 22,000 miles of track in 46 states.

When you consider the fact that 20 percent of all Americans live in the North-East and approximately 1,700 commuter trains travel the Northeast Corridor every day, we need to seriously consider the amount of congestion and overcrowding that would occur if these trains stopped running. I-95 is already clogged and lines at airports are increasing. If this plan goes through, millions of travelers would be added to this already extremely congested transportation system.

The facts are clear; Amtrak needs Federal support to survive, just like highways, ports, and airlines. America is a world leader in all other modes of transportation. When it comes to rail, we are quickly falling behind.

I tend to believe that any successful plan to fix passenger rail will require vision and truly bipartisan collaboration. We need the foresight to ensure the survival of this system by improving the safety and efficiency of passenger rail. Putting Amtrak on the chopping block directly contradicts this goal. Dozens of reform proposals exist without jeopardizing the viability of Amtrak and they should be openly debated in Congress.

Mr. Chairman, many Americans, including thousands in my State, depend on Amtrak for both business and pleasure. Instead of bankrupting the organization, we should work together to improve Amtrak.

The Department of Transportation's Inspector General estimates that Amtrak needs at least $1.4 billion to survive and the Amtrak Board recently put forward a strategic reform initiative that requires $1.82 billion to make important improvements to the system. The funding included in this amendment would simply allow passenger rail to squeeze by in the short-term and provide Americans with effective transportation options.

Passenger rail can be extremely effective in relieving congestion, cutting pollution, and lowering our demand for oil while creating jobs and increasing security. We have barely scratched the surface of passenger rail's potential, and a commitment from Congress to improving the viability of this system could lead to greatly expanded possibilities.

Reform will take time and require cooperation. I know many of my colleagues, and the Chairman of the Rail Subcommittee on Transportation and Infrastructure, join me in my commitment to defining an appropriate reform strategy. In the meantime, supporting this amendment can help to sustain Amtrak for millions of Americans.

Mr. Speaker, it is with great pleasure that I rise today to pay tribute to the newly elected President General of the National Society of the Sons of the American Revolution (SAR), Roland G. Downing, Ph.D. Following in the footsteps of Howard F. Horne, Dr. Downing is the second Delawarean to lead the SAR in the past 5 years.

While growing up in Nashville, Tennessee, Roland was active inside and outside of the classroom, attaining the rank of Eagle Scout, playing for his high school football team, and serving as the President of the student body. This commitment to excellence would continue at Vanderbilt University, where Roland earned a degree in organic chemistry.

After graduation, Roland would embark on a successful career with the Delaware-based DuPont Company, culminating in a 38-year tenure as Research Manager, Product Manager and Market Development Manager. During this time, Roland would take a brief hiatus to further his education, earning a PhD in organic chemistry. In addition to being a successful scientist, Dr. Downing served in the United States Naval Reserve for over 20 years, including a 3-year deployment at sea during the Korean War.

Prior to his election as President General, Dr. Downing held numerous other positions within the SAR, including: Secretary General, Treasurer General, Historian General, Regional Vice-President, and membership on the Executive Committee. Joining him in celebrating this new position are his lovely wife Norma, a son, two daughters, and eight grandchildren.

Mr. Speaker, in closing, I congratulate the SAR on their exceptional choice of Dr. Roland G. Downing as President General. He is an exemplary citizen, devoted family man, and most of all, a proud American.