Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk. Mr. Chairman, my amendment today seeks to limit funding for the surface transportation inspection program. Mr. Chairman, at a hearing held by the Transportation Security Subcommittee of…
Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk.
Mr. Chairman, my amendment today seeks to limit funding for the surface transportation inspection program.
Mr. Chairman, at a hearing held by the Transportation Security Subcommittee of Homeland Security, of which I am a member, industry witnesses raised serious concerns about the efficacy of the surface transportation inspection program. Here are some of the concerns raised at the hearing:
Most surface inspectors have no surface transportation experience or surface security background whatsoever. Many surface inspectors were promoted from screening passengers at airports;
These inspectors report to the Federal security directors at local airports who commonly also do not possess any surface transportation experience.
At least one local TSA official indicated he is always looking for things for his inspectors to do to occupy their time;
Most surface inspectors have two things to look for in a typical day: whether a transit system is reporting incidents to the TSA and a box is checked on their clipboard, and whether there is a security person on duty, another box to be checked on a clipboard;
The work of these inspectors is redundant, performed by employees of other agencies, such as the Department of Transportation, OSHA or EPA, and on and on. What they do is ultimately slow down commerce on our Nation's rails and highways.
Since 2008, TSA has more than doubled the size of the transportation inspection workforce and quadrupled the program's budget. Yet, according to the majority of stakeholders we heard from, there has been almost no tangible improvement in security as a result of these investments.
Last year, TSA's entire surface transportation security budget was $126 million. Of this amount, surface inspectors cost taxpayers $54 million, which does not even include headquarters, administration, oversight, and staff associated with the program. This means that the surface transportation inspection program, which has been labeled as ineffective by a number of freight, rail, passenger service, bus, and mass transit agencies, is consuming more than 40 percent of the entire surface transportation security budget.
Millions of Americans rely on surface transportation every day. More than 8 million people use public transportation in New York City alone. Despite this need, less than 2 percent of the TSA's nearly $8 billion budget goes toward securing our Nation's surface transportation systems, and a large
portion of that limited budget is being squandered on this ineffective inspection program.
Surface transportation security is too important to our national economy and receives too small a portion of homeland security funding to waste a single dollar. Opponents of this amendment may argue that it will result in Federal inspectors being put out of work. It will not. We are transferring money to implement more productive security measures within TSA. The question is simply: Why should taxpayers, especially those who rely on surface transportation every day, have to fund a program that has no proven ability to enhance security?
My amendment today seeks to limit the inspector program budget to $20 million, which would substantially reduce its size, and allow the saved money to be put forward in other more effective surface programs, such as canine detection units, particularly at bus and rail stations. This amendment strengthens security. It addresses concerns raised by the very transit systems the program is designed to protect.
Today, I ask you to join me in supporting this measure.
I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. Chairman, I demand a recorded vote.