Expressing Continued Support Of Congress For Equal Access Of Military Recruiters To Institutions Of Higher Education
Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to this resolution. It may seem peculiar, but, frankly, I think that the military does not need this resolution. It is not broken out there. They are having the ability to recruit. Even despite the…
Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to this resolution. It may seem peculiar, but, frankly, I think that the military does not need this resolution. It is not broken out there. They are having the ability to recruit. Even despite the negative news from Iraq, the recruitment numbers are up for all the services.
What this resolution does is sort of breaks this feeling in America that democracy allows divergence of opinion and that the people that own the real estate should have a voice in who can visit that real estate. We do not have any nationally owned universities, yet this resolution requires equal access for all military recruiters at institutions of higher education. I think we are getting into a really slippery area here because you are going to create within those campuses huge debates that students are going to say, we don't like this stuff being jammed down our throats. We and the faculty and the trustees of a university ought to be able to decide who can visit our campus, as they do in all other things.
For example, here in Washington, D.C., Catholic University does not allow pro-abortionist recruiters to come and talk on the campus, and here you are going to require, regardless of what the issue should be, that military recruiters have to be allowed on campus. I think it is a very slippery slope. I do not think we need to go there, because the recruitment numbers are not down. I think the military has historically stood on its own feet to do very well in recruiting without getting Congress involved mandating that they have to be on campuses. I think you are going to have a negative reaction.
I would urge Congress very carefully to think about this and to vote ``no'' until we get a better thought on how we want to mandate democracy in this country.
Mr. Speaker, I come to the floor today in strong opposition to H. Con. Res. 36.
It is a standard practice for institutions of higher learning to include a non-discrimination policy as part of their mission. These policies affirm that they do not tolerate discrimination on any number of issues: race, sex, religion, age, disability, social class, and sexual orientation. These non-discrimination policies were created so that all people in our country have the opportunity to be an equal and respected member of higher education communities.
Unfortunately the military has established a discriminatory policy, Don't Ask Don't Tell. This policy unfairly excludes homosexuals from military service on the basis of their sexual orientation alone. For example, numerous military linguists who are critically needed in the Global War on Terrorism have been discharged under Don't Ask Don't Tell. Supporters of H. Con. Res. 36 say that denying military recruiters access to college campuses is a national security threat, but they are completely missing the big picture. The real national security threat is the Don't Ask Don't Tell policy that forces our military to discharge gay servicemen and servicewomen regardless of their job performance.
I strongly believe that the non-discrimination policies of colleges and universities should be respected and I urge my colleagues to vote against this resolution.