I thank my good friend, Mr. Hunter, for yielding to me, and thank him for his friendship, his counsel, and his undeserved kind words about me. He has been a tireless advocate for our men and women in uniform, and this bill fittingly bears…
I thank my good friend, Mr. Hunter, for yielding to me, and thank him for his friendship, his counsel, and his undeserved kind words about me. He has been a tireless advocate for our men and women in uniform, and this bill fittingly bears his name.
I want to congratulate the gentleman from Missouri (Mr. Skelton) and the gentlewoman from California (Mrs. Tauscher). She has shown great thought, candor and leadership in guiding the Strategic Forces Subcommittee forward.
I want to rise in strong support of this bill. This is a good bill. It provides vital resources for our armed forces, and strengthens our Nation's strategic forces. Our committee has worked well and worked together in a bipartisan, bicameral manner to produce this important legislation.
I am pleased that it restores $124 million for the European missile defense sites, and modifies conditions that would allow construction to begin.
Since May, both the Czech Republic and Poland have signed missile defense agreement. Iran continues to test longer-range missiles and ignore questions about their nuclear program.
The efforts reflects a shared commitment to our collective security. Therefore, I want to personally commend the Czech and Polish governments and encourage swift ratification of the agreements.
Mr. Speaker, I would be remiss if I did not recognize my fellow subcommittee members on both sides of the aisle and their staffs. We tackled complex issues such as space, missile defense and nuclear weapons, and do such with openness, diligence and professionalism.
Let me finish with this troubling statistic. China graduated 500,000 engineers. India graduated 200,000 engineers, and the United States graduated 70,000. We have some serious challenges ahead of us to maintain our technical leadership in space.
I would like my complete statement put in the Record.
Mr. Speaker, I thank my good friend, Mr. Hunter for yielding to me, and thank him for his friendship and counsel. Mr. Hunter has been a tireless advocate for our men and women in uniform and it is fitting for this defense bill to bear his name.
I also want to recognize and congratulate the gentleman from Missouri, Mr. Skelton, and especially the gentlewoman from California, Mrs. Tauscher.
She has shown great thought, candor, and leadership in guiding the Strategic Forces subcommittee forward.
I rise in support of the Ducan Hunter Fiscal Year 2009 National Defense Authorization Act.
This is a good bill that provides vital resources for our armed forces, and strengthens our nation's strategic forces.
Our committee has worked together in a bi-partisan, bicameral manner to produce this important national security legislation.
This bill makes some noteworthy improvements over the version passed by the House in May.
I am pleased that it restores $124 million for the European missile defense sites, and modifies conditions that would allow construction to begin.
Since May, both the Czech Republic and Poland have signed missile defense agreements. Iran continues to test longer-range missiles and ignore questions about its nuclear program.
These efforts reflect a shared commitment to our collective security. Therefore, I want to personally commend the Czech and Polish governments, and encourage swift ratification of the agreements.
We continue to endorse the development and fielding of near-term missile defense capabilities. The bill--
Increases Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense and THAAD by $120 million; and
Authorizes Ground-based Midcourse Defense (GMD) at the budget request.
The bill also restores some funds to key future capabilities, specifically Airborne Laser, K-E-I and the Multiple Kill Vehicle.
I am disappointed that an independent study to examine the feasibility of space-based interceptors was not included in the agreement. With other nation's antisatellite pursuits and missile threats becoming more sophisticated, I
felt it was time to study the viability of such technology.
I remain concerned about the Department's performance in its missile defense testing and targets program.
I am, however, committed to working with them to ensure the conditions for success are in place, so we can build greater confidence in our defense capabilities.
In the area of military space, the bill funds key space modernization programs such as SBIRS, G-P-S-III, W-G-S, and T-SAT. We included a provision that requires the Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence to review our communications bandwidth requirements--to ensure we have the capabilities in place to support our future weapons systems.
Within the area of atomic energy defense activities, the bill reflects broad bipartisan agreement. The bill--
Adds funds for key nuclear surety and weapons surveillance activities;
Establishes a nonproliferation scholarship program for college students; and
Directs an assessment of how to increase the security of nuclear weapons around the world.
We also emphasize that the Department of Defense should pay greater attention to nuclear weapons matters, particularly in light of recent nuclear mishaps.
The next administration will be faced with tough decisions about our Nation's aging nuclear infrastructure, weapons systems, and workforce. I was disappointed that we did not fund the Reliable Replacement Warhead Phase 2a study. I ask my colleagues to take a hard look at this concept.
It has the potential to provide our Nation with a safer, more secure, and reliable nuclear deterrent, that may permit greater reductions in our stockpile.
Finally, Mr. Speaker, I would be remiss if I did not recognize my fellow subcommittee members on both sides of the aisle, and their staffs. We tackle complex issues such as space, missile defense, and nuclear weapons policy, and do so with openness, diligence, and professionalism.
As the Strategic Forces former chairman and now ranking member, I have had the great fortune to meet incredibly hard-working, talented space, nuclear, missile defense, and intelligence professionals. However, they need our help and continued support.
I heard a troubling statistic this morning:
China graduated 50O,000 engineers.
India graduated 200,000.
The United States only graduated 70,000.
We have some serious challenges ahead of us to maintain our technical leadership.
During my 16 years in the House, it has been an honor and privilege to work on the Armed Services Committee to enhance our nation strategic forces capabilities, strengthen our national security, and support our men and women in uniform.