Vessel Hull Design Protection Amendments Of 2006
Thank you, Chairman Sensenbrenner, for yielding this time. Mr. Speaker, H.R. 5120, which is incorporated into section 202 of S. 1785 has drawn bipartisan sponsorship from 23 of our colleagues in the House. I introduced this measure because…
Thank you, Chairman Sensenbrenner, for yielding this time.
Mr. Speaker, H.R. 5120, which is incorporated into section 202 of S. 1785 has drawn bipartisan sponsorship from 23 of our colleagues in the House. I introduced this measure because I believe it is both good patent policy and sound health care policy.
It corrects an inequity in the patent law and will encourage important innovation in medical research, precisely the purpose that Congress sought to accomplish in enacting the Hatch-Waxman Act. In the patenting process, there are several examples of relief that are available for late filings, late payments and deficient filings.
By enacting section 202 of S. 1785, we are continuing to promote the basic purpose of Hatch-Waxman, and we are strengthening Hatch-Waxman. It is important to do this so that our Nation will continue to lead the way in medical research, and so that patients will not be denied promising new innovative developments.
Mr. Speaker, I include for the Record letters from medical practitioners and consumer groups from across this country supporting this legislation. Included are letters from the Cleveland Clinic Foundation Heart Center, the Emory University Healthcare Heart Center, and the University of California Los Angeles Medical Center Cardiology Section. Their credentials and their views are impressive. They emphasize the health care advantages of this measure, particularly its effect on opening up new advantageous avenues of medical research to prevent and treat stroke.
The Carlyle Fraser Heart Center
at Crawford Long Hospital,
Athens, GA, June 15, 2006.
Congressman John Lewis,
House of Representatives,
Washington, DC.
Dear Representative Lewis: I received a phone call today
from Clive Meanwell, Chief Executive Officer of The Medicines
Company, regarding H.R. 5120, relating to the patent
restoration provisions of the Hatch-Waxman law. I am the
Director of Interventional Cardiology at Emory Crawford Long
Hospital and have been on the faculty of Emory University
School of Medicine for thirteen years. I am also the
President of the Greater Atlanta Division of the American
Heart Association (AHA), and a medical reporter for FOX-5
television. The major focus of my profession is the care of
patients with advanced and complex cardiovascular disease,
particularly those undergoing interventional procedures
(commonly known as stents) of the arteries of their heart and
elsewhere in the body.
I am writing in support of H.R. 5120 because I understand
that, if it passes, the anticoagulant drug Angiomax may
become eligible for patent term restoration. This would allow
for further investment in clinical development. Angiomax is a
critically important product which is used in the
overwhelming majority (thousands) of the interventional
procedures at Emory. Angiomax is an important therapy because
it provides safe, effective, and cost-effective anti
coagulation during interventional procedures. In addition,
several Emory physicians have performed extensive research on
Angiomax. Emory was one of the leading U.S. centers in a
recent trial studying this product. I am perhaps one of the
Nation's leading experts and researchers in this area and
have lectured internationally and published extensively in
this area. Within the last month, we submitted approximately
twenty individual research abstracts on Angiomax to the
American Heart Association and Transcatheter Cardiovascular
Therapeutics national meetings. Our research shows that
Angiomax provides equal efficacy to other drugs, costs less,
is easier to use, and causes less risk of bleeding
complications. Bleeding complications have been shown to
increase mortality and are particularly common in patients
who are: elderly, female, African-American, and those with
kidney disease, anemia, and high blood pressure. I have
attached two of our abstracts highlighting the consequences
of bleeding complications. These types of patients make up
the majority of the patients at our institution. Better
outcomes and a reduction in healthcare costs with Angiomax is
what we want for the patients of our community.
But that is only part of the story. Patent term restoration
for Angiomax is important because preliminary experience
suggests that Angiomax may be useful in preventing and
treating stroke but more studies are needed. Stroke is the
Nation's number one cause of disability and third leading
cause of death. Over 700,000 Americans suffer strokes each
year--one every 45 seconds; over 165,000 die and many
thousand more are disabled for life. I know that you are
aware that Georgia is part of the high-risk ``stroke belt''.
In my capacity with the AHA, one of our major initiatives is
reducing the risk of stroke. Unfortunately, the blood
thinning and clot-busting agents currently utilized to treat
stroke patients can cause dangerous side effects, including
intracranial bleeds (as was seen so vividly with Israeli
Prime Minister Sharon). Angiomax may be useful in the
prevention and treatment of strokes with fewer bleeding side
effects. But the very costly and time-consuming clinical
trials (which Emory will likely be involved with) which will
be needed to explore this and other promising new uses (such
as patients undergoing open-heart surgery) will not be
feasible unless patent term restoration under the Hatch-
Waxman Act is available to the drug's developer.
It is vital that H.R. 5120 be enacted so that research in
stroke is undertaken to evaluate the use of Angiomax in the
treatment and prevention of this debilitating disease. I
would be happy to discuss this matter further with you at
your convenience.
Very truly yours,
Steven V. Manoukian, M.D.,
Director, Interventional Cardiology, Emory Crawford Long
Hospital, Emory University School of Medicine.
