Mr. Chairman, I thank the gentleman for yielding me this time. As a matter of fact, when Castro denied the authority, because he knows very well who he does not want to allow from this body to enter Cuba, he called the gentleman from…
Mr. Chairman, I thank the gentleman for yielding me this time.
As a matter of fact, when Castro denied the authority, because he knows very well who he does not want to allow from this body to enter Cuba, he called the gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Wolf) and the gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Smith) provocateurs for having sought permission to enter, because the dictator knows that the gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Wolf) and the gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Smith) would go and try to visit Dr. Oscar Elias Biscet and the other political prisoners, the thousands of political prisoners in Cuba. That is their attempt, and the dictator knows.
The issue here, Mr. Chairman, is very simple. The people who have family in Cuba, Cuban-Americans who send aid to family members in Cuba, are in our districts, in the district that I am honored to represent, in the district of the gentlewoman from Florida (Ms. Ros-Lehtinen), of the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Mario Diaz-Balart), and of the gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Menendez). But this amendment says, our constituents cannot know what is right for their families. This amendment says, we know better.
By the way, the gentleman from Florida made a series of statements that were factually untrue. He said that the new regulations that have just come into effect promulgated by President Bush prohibit humanitarian aid of food and medicine. I believe the gentleman from Florida said that. That is untrue.
The gentleman also said that the new regulations promulgated by President Bush prohibit family members from sending such humanitarian aid to immediate family members. He said that. That is factually untrue.
So I would recommend to the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Davis) that he read the new regulations.
I think the gentleman should read the regulations first.
Well, then why would the gentleman say that immediate family members would not be able to receive food and medicine?
Why would the gentleman say that if he had read the regulations?
That is not what the gentleman said.
Reclaiming my time, Mr. Chairman, the new regulations, this gentleman said and it is on the record, that food and medicine is prohibited to, he said, children and fathers and sons. So anyway, that is factually incorrect.
I am glad that he said he read the regulations, but obviously he did not understand them. Maybe he should read them again.
Now, Mr. Chairman, prodemocracy leaders inside of Cuba, the gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Wolf) just mentioned that he sought to visit with them, risking their lives, have sent us a statement that we received just a few days ago, supporting President Bush's measures, stating, ``These measures of the United States Government are designed to bring about democracy in Cuba. These measures will not only benefit the Cubans who live on the island, but also those in exile, leading Cuba to a peaceful transition, and the people themselves will claim their legitimate rights which were stolen from them by the Communist dictatorship in 1959. The dollars that enter the country go directly into the coffers of Castro's Communist system, allowing them to continue enjoying the goods and pleasures that are denied to the Cuban people. They will continue to live above Cuba's working and exploited class, without even thinking of the common Cuban.''
Now, they signed this. They risked their lives to send us this statement. Numerous prodemocracy activists. They are not, by the way, the so-called ``dissidents'' that are allowed by the regime to travel the world to get awards or to come here to Congress to lobby against sanctions on the dictatorship. These are people in the political prisons or risking their lives because they know that at any moment they could be thrown into those totalitarian gulags and given sham trials where they are sentenced to decades in the gulag.
But this amendment, Mr. Chairman, says, We know better than those people. This amendment, Mr. Chairman, is
dishonest. This amendment is condescending. It seeks to undermine an entire policy that President Bush has just implemented to serve the interest of a brutal dictatorship.
The Democratic Party November 30 ``Frank Pais'', along with the November 30 Movement in Exile, after debating the pros and cons of the new measures that will be enforced beginning June 30, 2004 state the following consensus:
As far as we are informed, we agree to accept the measures imposed by the United States government. We know that they are designed to bring about democracy in Cuba.
We recognize that many common Cubans will be severely affected and specially the children, the elderly and the ill but we, as members of the Cuban opposition, will try to care for those families as best we can, relying on the unconditional assistance of the Exile community.
On the other hand, there are tens of thousands of Cubans who live off the remittances sent to them by their families in the United States. They even travel to the United States and do nothing to help improve the situation of common Cubans.
We believe, and are almost certain that these measures will not only benefit the Cubans who live on the island, but also those in Exile, leading Cuba to a peaceful transition and the people themselves will claim their legitimate rights, which were stolen from them by the communist dictatorship in 1959.
It is important that the people know that the government of Fidel Castro, as a decaying system, no longer has anywhere to purchase goods because it is in debt to the entire World and the dollars that enter the Country go directly into the coffers of Castro's communist system, allowing them to continue enjoying the goods and pleasures that are denied to the Cuban people. Furthermore, they will continue to live above Cuba's working and exploited class, without even thinking of the common Cuban.
Many families live off the clothes and shoes that their families in Exile work so hard to send them, but the Cubans over there, just like the ones here, must remember that the first one who separated the Cuban family was Castro's communist government, who forbade the people from receiving even a single letter from relatives. Many Cubans--far from going out on the streets in protest--chose to settle in Exile and now they protest against whom they should not protest. They should come and protest against Fidel Castro who is the only one responsible for all these measures.
The double standard must cease, they must go out into the streets if they wish to receive remittances to change the grey and sad destiny of the homeland of Marti. Let no one doubt it, victory is closer each day. We only need the unity of all, and with all, of all and by all, therein lies the success of victory against the dictatorship that for 45 years has sunk the people of Cuba into mud and misery.
We are counting on you, our Cuban brothers and sisters in Exile and within Cuba.
Long Live a Free Cuba!
Havana, June 27, 2004.
Mirta Villanueva.
Reinaldo Gante Hidalgo--activist of the November 30 Movement; Ernesto Medina Pascual--activist of the November 30 Movement; Camilo Perez Villanueva--activist of the November 30 Movement; Afredo Vapan Marquez--activist of the November 30 Movement; Luis Almansa Veleta-- activist of the November 30 Movement; Victor Junier Fernandez Martinez--activist of the November 30 Movement; Ada Kaly Marquez Abascal--National Coordinator for functions of the Democratic Party November 30 ``Frank Pais'' and correspondent for the Oriental Zone of the Information Bridge Cuba-Miami.
Statement given via telephone by Ada Kaly Marquez Abascal--National Coordinator for functions of the Democratic Party November 30 ``Frank Pais'' and correspondent for the Oriental Zone of the Information Bridge Cuba-Miami, for the Information Bridge Cuba-Miami and Net For Cuba on the 27th day of June, 2004.
I would ask all of our colleagues to reject this amendment, to support President Bush's policy to hasten the democratic transition in Cuba. Oppose the Flake amendment.