Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, we are here today to discuss what House Democrats are now calling the America COMPETES Act, and frankly, it is a shame. It is a shame that they are framing this as a bill…
Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, we are here today to discuss what House Democrats are now calling the America COMPETES Act, and frankly, it is a shame. It is a shame that they are framing this as a bill about competitiveness. While it may have started as just that, it has now morphed into another attempt to impose the Democrats' out-of-touch agenda on America.
Mr. Speaker, the sad reality is that we are in desperate need of a competitiveness bill. The Chinese Communist Party is trying to overtake us and intends to overtake us as the global leader in science and technology because they know that leadership in science directly equates to a stronger economy, a more secure homeland, and greater influence in ethical standards that underpin all of our emerging technologies.
It is no wonder that the Chinese Communist Party is doing everything in its power to take every possible advantage in this global competition. The Chinese Communist Party is outspending us on research and development. They are graduating more STEM students and building their high-tech workforce faster than we are, and they are acquiring valuable research and intellectual property through any means necessary, absolutely including forced acquisition and theft.
Mr. Speaker, they are stealing their way to the top, and it is not an exaggeration to say that countering China's global influence must be one of our highest priorities in Congress.
The House Science, Space, and Technology Committee with Chairwoman Johnson's and Ranking Member Lucas' leadership took on this responsibility--and rightly so--and did what the American people expect us to do. We spent more than 1 year meeting with stakeholders, gathering feedback, finding consensus policies, and passing bipartisan legislation. In total, with their leadership and with the great work of the Science, Space, and Technology Committee, we passed a dozen bills to double down on our investment and transformative basic research, build our STEM workforce, and strategically support the most important emerging technologies like artificial intelligence, quantum sciences, and advanced manufacturing.
While you will hear about all of those bills that are in this package, Mr. Speaker, it is inaccurate to say this is a China bill or a competitiveness bill. I want to be crystal clear: This is not bipartisan legislation, and it is not focused on the problems at hand.
If the Speaker and our colleagues, the House Democrats, were serious about addressing the threat from the Chinese Communist Party, then they would have moved our science bill--those dozen bills--into conference months ago. We have been ready to go since June, and everyone who has worked on it on both sides of the aisle knows it. That is when the two core elements of our package passed the House with overwhelming bipartisan support.
Instead, this body wasted all summer and fall on massive spending bills like Build Back Better, and now we have little to show for it. So here we are, on Groundhog Day, fittingly and sadly, going through the same exercise we have already done multiple times.
Let's be candid. Democrats are trying to cram through a massive bill filled with unnecessary spending that dramatically alters what has passed through this House instead of focusing on the issues at hand. What started as a bipartisan effort to keep the U.S. globally competitive somehow, in the last few weeks, went through the black box of Speaker Pelosi's office and emerged as the Build Back Better backup plan filled with failed initiatives and progressive demands.
Instead of addressing competition and the threat from the Communist leadership in China, this bill now corrupts good, solid bipartisan work I was personally very proud of, and it corrupts it with thousands of pages of irrelevant policies.
What kind of China bill mentions coral reefs more than China?
There are very real consequences to this bad faith effort. As much as 85 percent of America's long-term economic growth is due to advances in science and technology. We cannot take that continued growth for granted.
I can assure you, Mr. Speaker, when the Chinese Communist Party considers how to outpace us in the technologies of the future, they aren't wasting their time and money on U.N. climate funds, which, by the way, send money right back over to Beijing. We should be taking this every bit as seriously as they are.
I expect my Republican colleagues will share the countless poison pills that have been inserted into this bill, so I won't elaborate on them here. Instead, I will simply urge my colleagues, with a heavy heart, to oppose this bill and urge Democratic leadership to get serious about the threat from China.
Let's stay focused on that threat. Let's go to conference with a clean bipartisan competitiveness bill and set our country up for the continued economic success that Americans deserve.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 5 minutes to the gentleman from Texas (Mr. McCaul), who is the Republican leader of the Foreign Affairs Committee.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 5 minutes to the gentlewoman from Washington (Mrs. Rodgers), the Republican leader of the Energy and Commerce Committee.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from California (Mr. McCarthy), the Republican leader.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentlewoman from North Carolina (Ms. Foxx), the Republican leader of the Education and Labor Committee.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from Nebraska (Mr. Smith).
Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentlewoman from Oklahoma (Mrs. Bice).
Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Iowa (Mr. Feenstra).
Mr. Speaker, I yield 4 minutes to the gentleman from the great State of Texas (Mr. Weber).
Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Kentucky (Mr. Barr).
Mr. Speaker, I yield the gentleman from Kentucky an additional 1 minute.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. LaHood).
Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Ohio (Mr. Chabot).
Mr. Speaker, I yield 5 minutes to the gentleman from Arkansas (Mr. Westerman), the Republican leader of the Committee on Natural Resources.
Madam Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. Meuser).
Madam Speaker, I yield an additional 30 seconds to the gentleman from Pennsylvania.
Madam Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from North Carolina (Mr. Murphy).
Madam Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentlewoman from Georgia (Mrs. Greene).
Madam Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentlewoman from Missouri (Mrs. Hartzler).
Madam Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Arrington).
Madam Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Wisconsin (Mr. Tiffany).
Madam Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentlewoman from West Virginia (Mrs. Miller).
Madam Speaker, I yield the balance of my time to the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Babin) to control the remaining time.