Mr. Speaker, I rise in strong support of my bipartisan bill, H.R. 4090, the Critical Mineral Dominance Act. This bill will help strengthen our Nation's critical mineral security and enable our critical mineral dominance by codifying…
Mr. Speaker, I rise in strong support of my bipartisan bill, H.R. 4090, the Critical Mineral Dominance Act.
This bill will help strengthen our Nation's critical mineral security and enable our critical mineral dominance by codifying several of the policies that President Trump put forth in his hardrock mining executive orders earlier this year.
This bill does three things, Mr. Speaker. First, it mandates a new study on the cost of U.S. mineral import reliance, including from adversarial nations like China. This will help give the United States a much clearer picture into our critical mineral security, including what kind of vulnerabilities we face by failing to mine here and continuing to depend on other nations.
Next, it requires the administration to expedite priority mining projects on Federal lands and identify Federal lands that have the potential for new mineral production, as well as increase geological mapping to give us a much clearer picture of our incredible mineral wealth right here in the United States.
Lastly, this bill directs the Secretary of the Interior to revise or rescind any agency actions that are a barrier to domestic mining, as well as make recommendations to Congress as to how current law can be changed to streamline mineral development. It will also conduct a broader review of State and local laws that are also holding us back from our true mineral potential.
I think each and every one of my colleagues in this body, from both sides of the aisle, Mr. Speaker, understands and realizes the important role that critical minerals play in our 21st century economy. This will only increase as time goes on.
We have tremendous mineral wealth in our country, not only in my district in northern Minnesota, which is home to the largest untapped copper-nickel deposit in the world, but in States all across this great Nation.
There is no reason for the United States to be dependent on other countries, including foreign adversarial nations, for our critical mineral future. Nobody does it better than the United States.
I implore my colleagues: Where is the world currently mining for critical minerals that have better labor standards or environmental standards than us?
Mr. Speaker, nothing in this bill green-lights any mining project without necessary scrutiny. Nothing in this bill allows for a project to bypass NEPA, the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, or the Endangered Species Act, nothing.
This bill is a strong signal from Congress to the executive branch that we need to get serious about our critical mineral strategy and take necessary steps to win once again.
Before I yield back, I would note a number of the outside groups that are supporting this legislation. They include labor unions like the North America's Building Trades Unions and the Laborers' International Union of North America, LIUNA.
Mr. Speaker, I include in the Record a statement in support from Albert Gore, executive director of Zero Emission Transportation Association, representing the views of the domestic electric vehicle industry; a letter of support from a group of 17 organizations representing different areas of the domestic mining sector; a letter of support from the Essential Minerals Association; and a November 2025 op-ed published by RealClearEnergy, expressing support for this legislation.
January 16, 2025.
Zero Emission Transportation Association (ZETA) is an
industry coalition representing approximately 50 companies
spanning the electric vehicle (EV) supply chain end-to-end,
including critical mineral and material producers, cell and
battery manufacturers, vehicle manufacturers, charging
companies and electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE)
providers, utility companies, and battery recyclers.
The United States is blessed to have vast mineral
resources, but a holistic government approach is needed to
fully unlock them. Critical minerals and materials are
necessary for EVs, battery manufacturing, defense, and nearly
every other advanced technology industry. Enabling the United
States to truly compete in these sectors is necessary to
maintain our edge in the global marketplace and create jobs
here at home.
H.R. 4090 (Stauber), the Critical Mineral Dominance Act,
helps us achieve this goal by supporting the secure and
reliable sourcing of minerals for domestic manufacturing.
Among other provisions, the bill directs the Secretary of the
Interior to determine the economic impact of each mineral
commodity for which the U.S. is import reliant, continue
mapping federal lands suitable for mineral development,
analyze regulations that may handicap the development of
domestic projects, and provide Congressional committees of
jurisdiction recommended policy changes to reduce regulatory
burdens for project development.
We were glad to see this legislation move through the
Committee on Natural Resources, and encourage Members of
Congress to support this bill when it comes to the House
Floor for consideration.
Sincerely,
Albert Gore,
Executive Director.
Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to join me in supporting this bipartisan piece of legislation, H.R. 4090.
Mr. Speaker, my good friends on the other side of the aisle will promote, again, anywhere but America and any worker but the American worker when it comes to mining. Anywhere but America, and any worker but the American worker.
They are exporting their environmental guilt. They are okay with getting these critical minerals mined by child slave labor.
Mr. Speaker, 30 percent of the cobalt comes from child slave labor. Both the Trump and the Biden administration agree with that.
Mr. Speaker, there is nothing in this legislation that removes NEPA. Nothing in this legislation removes the clean water. Nothing in this legislation removes the clean air in the decisionmaking, and nothing in this legislation removes any of the endangered species protections.
Mr. Speaker, we took a bipartisan trip last year up to Alaska. Greens Creek Mine is in a national monument. There is exceptional mining of the nickel in the national monument. We can do it here, Mr. Speaker, better than anywhere. We have the mineral wealth. We have the workers. We can do both. We can have a clean environment and clean water and domestically mine.
My friends across the aisle consistently say: Yes, we need critical minerals. Yes, we need if for strategic national security. Yes, we need it for medical instrument technology. Yes, we need it for our everyday lives. They refuse to allow it to happen. They put up roadblock after roadblock. They say that they want it, but they never support it, or very rarely support it.
That is the mindset and the philosophy, Mr. Speaker, that has brought American critical mineral mining to its knees and allowed China to take over.
China's global mineral dominance is not a threat. It is a reality. This is what is happening right now because of that philosophy of not in my backyard, not in our backyard.
There is a philosophy that it is better in our backyard. We do it better than anybody. Look at the unions that are supporting this piece of legislation. It came out of committee in a bipartisan fashion. This is what the American people want, bipartisan work. Here it is.
I look forward to this bipartisan piece of legislation that strengthens our national security moving forward this afternoon.
Mr. Speaker, I want to paraphrase in my own mind what was said moments ago across the aisle, real simple: anywhere but America, any worker but the American worker. I am paraphrasing from my own mind what I heard. The excuses, the excuses, the excuses, the excuses. We have to mine here. We can't mine here.
In fact, Mr. Speaker, the gentlewoman who just spoke in her beautiful State, she has allowed oil and gas development. In her beautiful State, she has allowed mining. Why not in my State? Why can't my union workers make the $135,000-a-year jobs, but in her State it is okay? This bill is for the entire country.
Mr. Speaker, my constituents need good-paying jobs, too. It is good for our economy and good for our communities. The technology we use is second to none.
I want to answer my friend from New Mexico who just spoke. She asked: Why aren't we processing and refining here? I have good news for her. Very shortly, there is going to be legislation to allow that, to permit the mining and processing here in the United States of America. I am going to go directly to my good friend and colleague from New Mexico to help sponsor that with me because she is right. Let's do it here. Let's mine here, Mr. Speaker. I am going to give her and my friends across the aisle that opportunity very shortly.
The fact of the matter is, we have the opportunity. We have to remove the political science--the truth and the facts--to allow this mining to move forward.
This is our backyard. My good friend across the aisle, who is managing the debate, talked about the economic value or the lack thereof. I share with my good friend and colleague that in my State of Minnesota, just one mine proposed, just one, will bring between $1.4 and $1.8 billion of Federal revenue, $800 million for the taxpayers of Minnesota. Every single school district in the great State of Minnesota benefits from mining.
You want to know why I am passionate? These are my constituents that will be mining these critical minerals with the best labor standards and the best environmental standards in the world. We have been mining in Minnesota for 145 years. We have mined the iron ore that makes over 80 percent of this Nation's steel.
The cleanest water in the State of Minnesota, Mr. Speaker, is in the heart of mining country in Buhl, Minnesota. We know how to do it.
Let's stop exporting our environmental guilt. Let's stop exporting our environmental guilt and do it here with our labor standards, our technology, and our workers.
I am happy that New Mexico has oil and gas development and mining development. I am happy for those workers. We need that. Let Minnesota mine.