I thank the gentleman for yielding me this time. I have a statement which I will submit, Mr. Chairman, for the record. I would just like to say that I am in very strong support of this legislation. Welfare reform goes back a long time in…
I thank the gentleman for yielding me this time. I have a statement which I will submit, Mr. Chairman, for the record.
I would just like to say that I am in very strong support of this legislation. Welfare reform goes back a long time in this country, well before Congress actually got too involved in it. It goes back to the States in the 1980s in which a number of States came forward and said they could do something about welfare reform. Finally, in the Family Support Act of 1988, the Federal Government got involved.
Again, in 1996, we passed welfare reform legislation. We debated it last year and passed a bill, and now here we are again on the floor. Virtually every time we have done this, every single time, the opposition to it has gotten up and said, We can't do this. It's impossible. You can't get this much out of people. You can't get blood out of a stone.
This is a human issue. If you go back into the jurisdictions where we all live and you see what they have done with welfare reform, if you see the opportunities that we have given to people who in many instances now are living middle-class lives because of a middle-class income, you see the real circumstances of what we can do to help people. There has been no social program that has uplifted people more in this country in a true sense of giving them an opportunity as America allows you to have as has welfare reform.
This legislation continues a lot of the support systems which are necessary, including the educational components, the day care components, the transportation components in the things that have to be done.
I too believe that we need to refine this somewhat. I am a little concerned about the transitional medical assistance in terms of Medicaid continuations. I do worry about transportation. We all worry about day care a little bit.
I think there needs to be sufficient flexibility at the State and local levels to carry out what needs to be done in welfare reform, but I believe this legislation has the basic parameters which will allow this to happen, and I believe this is the next extension of what we have to do in the Congress to allow the States across America to continue their welfare reform programs.
I, for one, believe it can be done. I grant you, the economy is not what I would like to see either, but I believe that it can be done sufficiently to help a lot of people, and then you will see all of those people whom I have seen who will say, Thank you for giving me the opportunity; I am able to help my family now.
I support the legislation. I hope we all can support the legislation.
The 1996 welfare reform law replaced a broken system with one of the most successful government programs in recent history.
As Governor, I promoted work as the ladder to opportunity. Former recipients told me that they needed help breaking away from welfare dependency, but once they found their place in the workforce, they were able to create better lives for their families.
For that reason, I was proud to make work the foundation of the 1996 reform. Today, national data confirms our success. Caseloads are down. Household incomes are up.
Welfare recipients now appreciate the value of work. We provide time and assistance, but understand that welfare cannot be an open-ended entitlement--or a way of life. We help those on assistance, but do not allow them to become passive dependents on the welfare system.
Today's legislation strengthens and embraces these goals.
In particular, H.R. 4 recognizes the education needs of children and includes my language to increase funding for quality initiatives, such as teacher training. H.R. 4 also provides historic funding levels for child care. Both mandatory and discretionary programs, now appropriated at $4.8 billion, will grow by $2 billion.
Yet, these programs are only part of a larger picture. States spend TANF grants on child care--either directly or through funding transfers. And Congress supports child care through other programs like Head Start. Recent estimates show that annual child care funding exceeds $18 billion--a significant investment, by any measure.
This bill also contains language from a bill I introduced, ``The Child Support Fairness and Tax Refund Intercept Act,'' to help custodial spouses collect past due child support even if their child is no longer a minor. A Wilmington, Delaware woman, Lisa McCave, was owed several thousands of dollars in past due child support. The Federal Government discovered that the father was about to receive several thousand dollars in a tax refund. However, because her son was no longer a minor, the IRS could not intercept that money for her. She had to work two jobs to raise her son and put him through college, while he waited out the clock until his son was no longer a minor so he could enjoy his tax refund. Thanks to Lisa McCave's willingness to step forward and ask for justice, millions of parents in the future will be able to intercept tax returns to pay the child support owed them, even if their child is no longer a minor.
With all the improvements to our welfare system contained in this bill, I believe there are a few issues we should continue to review. I appreciate the one year extension of Transitional Medical Assistance, a program that provides continued health coverage for former welfare recipients, but I hope we can extend and simplify this authorization for five years as the President's FY 04 budget recommends--and do so in a way that does not effect Medicaid administrative funds. I have introduced legislation with Congressman Levin to extend this valuable program, and I look forward to working with the Senate and the President to accomplish this goal.
Also, it is my hope that we can reinstate the state flexibility provisions and give our Governors the ability to find innovative ways to meet and exceed the goals of this legislation. State waivers were critical to Delaware's success in the past and they are critical to our continued success in the future.
Finally, education is important to reducing unplanned pregnancies and achieving independence for working men and women. Abstinence education is an important part of this effort. Yet, the language in H.R. 4 provides an overly simple solution to a complex problem. In my opinion, we cannot restrict access to basic health information if we are to promote responsibility.
In conclusion, I support H.R. 4--the beginning of our efforts this year to create the next generation of welfare success stories.