Mr. Speaker, I thank the chairman for yielding me time. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of the bill, the Tailored Regulatory Updates for Supervisory Testing Act, otherwise known as the TRUST Act. Back home in western North Carolina,…
Mr. Speaker, I thank the chairman for yielding me time.
Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of the bill, the Tailored Regulatory Updates for Supervisory Testing Act, otherwise known as the TRUST Act.
Back home in western North Carolina, and in so much of rural America, community banks are very often the only financial institution in so many of our small towns. These are the banks that are helping a young couple get approved for their first mortgage or sitting down with someone who wants to open a business to be able to extend that line of credit that they need to do so.
Our community bankers are involved in the community. They give back to charity, as they truly are a part of the community and a key part of our economy.
Right now what is happening is these small-town banks are suffocating under a regulatory system that just does not make sense. It is one- size-fits-all, and it really makes no sense to treat a small, rural community bank to the same exact regulatory and compliance standards as you do with the really super large banks that you have around the country. It is just not fair. They can't keep up with it, and it just causes ridiculous costs that don't make sense.
The central issue that this bill goes to is to address the examination cycle that these banks are required to undergo.
The way it works is Federal regulators routinely examine banks to make sure they are operating safely and responsibly; something that is extremely important. We cannot cut down on oversight.
Under current law, the healthiest community banks can qualify for examinations every 18 months instead of 12 months, but the eligibility for that relief is tied to an outdated asset threshold that was set back in 2018 which has not been updated since then.
At that time, about 94 percent of community banks fell under the $3 billion threshold that allowed them to qualify for the longer examination cycle. Today, because of inflation and economic growth alone, it takes nearly $6 billion in assets to cover that same share of banks.
Let's call this what it is. These banks did not suddenly become reckless overnight or stop serving their communities responsibly. The only thing that changed was the economy grew, and Washington never bothered to modernize the rules.
That means that well-run community banks are now being pushed to more frequent exam cycles simply because of an outdated number on paper that no longer reflects the reality.
Here is what happens. Every hour spent preparing paperwork for regulators is an hour not spent helping small businesses and helping individuals who need to get access to credit. What has to happen is this has to be updated. Congress can do this, and I believe they will do this today.
Passing the TRUST Act would update the threshold from $3 billion to $6 billion. What that would do is allow this law to reflect today's economy, and community banks will continue to qualify for the same regulatory relief that Congress originally intended.
Absolutely just as important, the bill does not weaken the safety and soundness standards one bit. These institutions must still maintain strong ratings, be well-capitalized and operate without enforcement actions.
To someone who is watching at home today or hears about this and wonders, why is this important? Well, it is important because if you cut down on the amount of regulations, the amount of red tape, the amount of money that just goes into the bureaucracy to feed this, if you stop spending that money there, you have that money to put into small businesses and to provide money to working families, folks who need access to capital.
For that reason and so many more--I know this is a great bill, and I appreciate the support--I urge the body's passage.